eu-charter

Cairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh

Airteagal 7 - Meas ar an saol príobháideach agus ar shaol an teaghlaigh

Airteagal 7 - Meas ar an saol príobháideach agus ar shaol an teaghlaigh

Tá ag gach duine an ceart go ndéanfar a shaol nó a saol príobháideach agus a shaol nó a saol teaghlaigh, a chónaí nó a cónaí agus a chumarsáidí nó a cumarsáidí a urramú.

  • Text:

    Freagraíonn na cearta a ráthaítear in Airteagal 7 do na cearta a ráthaítear in Airteagal 8 den CECD. Chun forbairtí sa teicneolaíocht a chur san áireamh, tá an focal `cumarsáid` curtha isteach in ionad an fhocail `comhfhreagras`.
    I gcomhréir le hAirteagal 52(3) is ionann brí agus raon feidhme dó agus don Airteagal comhfhreagrach sa CECD. Dá dheasca sin, is ionann na teorainneacha a fhéadfar a fhorchur go dlisteanach leis an gceart seo agus na teorainneacha a cheadaítear le hAirteagal 8 den CECD:
    `1. Tá ag gach uile dhuine an ceart chun go mba slán dó a shaol príobháideach agus saol a theaghlaigh, a ionad cónaithe agus a chomhfhreagras.
    2. Ní chuirfidh aon údarás poiblí isteach ar fheidhmiú an chirt seo, ach sa mhéid go mbeidh sin de réir an dlí agus riachtanach i ndaonlathas ar mhaithe leis an tslándáil náisiúnta, le sábháilteacht an phobail nó le leas eacnamaíoch na tíre, chun anord nó coiriúlacht a chosc, chun sláinte nó moráltacht a chosaint nó chun cearta agus saoirsí daoine eile a chosaint.`

    Source:
    Iris Oifigiúil an Aontais Eorpaigh C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
    Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
    Ullmhaíodh na mínithe seo i dtosach faoi údarás Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin a dhréachtaigh an Chairt um Chearta Bunúsacha an Aontais Eorpaigh. Tugadh suas chun dáta iad faoi chúram Praesidium an Choinbhinsiúin Eorpaigh i bhfianaise na gcoigeartuithe dréachtaithe a rinne an Coinbhinsiún sin ar théacs na Cairte (go háirithe ar Airteagail 51 agus 52) agus i bhfianaise an fhoráis a tháinig ar dhlí an Aontais. Cé nach bhfuil stádas dlí acu iontu féin, is mór is fiú iad mar uirlis léirithe arb é is aidhm di forálacha na Cairte a shoiléiriú.
  • Nexans France and Nexans v European Commission
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Second Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:571
  • Plaintiff: Ž.B. Respondent/interested party: Civil Registry Division of Vilnius City Municipal Administration Authority issuing the opinion in the case: The State Commission of the Lithuanian Language
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Vilnius city district court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Ž.B. v. Civil Registry Division of Vilnius City Municipal Administration
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • The commercial MIRACLIA TELECOMUNICACIONES, S.L. against the STATE ADMINISTRATION.
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    The Spanish Supreme Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • European Commission v Hungary.
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Grand Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:476
  • Mr. … v. State of Luxembourg (anonymised judgment)
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Higher Administrative Court of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Mr T/France
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Court of Cassation
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:CR00434
  • Nexans France and Nexans v European Commission
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Advocate General
    Type:
    Opinion
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:207
  • Dwyer vs. The Commissioner of An Garda Siochana, Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, Ireland and Attorney General
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Supreme Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Appeal for unconstitutionality filed by more than fifty members of the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea in the Congress of Deputies (the Spanish National Parliament), against Law 5/2018, of 11 June, amending Law 1/2000, of 7 January, on civil proceedings, in relation to the illegal occupation of housing
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    The Constitutional Court
    Type:
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:ES:TC:2019:32

0 results found

0 results found

0 results found