eu-charter

Listina Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah

Člen 7 - Spoštovanje zasebnega in družinskega življenja

Člen 7 - Spoštovanje zasebnega in družinskega življenja

Vsakdo ima pravico do spoštovanja svojega zasebnega in družinskega življenja, stanovanja ter komunikacij.

  • Text:

    Pravice, zagotovljene s členom 7, ustrezajo pravicam, zagotovljenim z 8. členom EKČP. Zaradi upoštevanja tehnološkega razvoja je bila beseda `dopisovanje` zamenjana s `komunikacijami`.
    V skladu s členom 52(3) sta pomen in obseg te pravice enaka kot v ustreznem členu EKČP. Zaradi tega so omejitve, ki se lahko za to pravico legitimno uvedejo, enake tistim, ki jih dovoljuje 8. člen EKČP:
    `1. Vsakdo ima pravico do spoštovanja svojega zasebnega in družinskega življenja, svojega doma in dopisovanja.
    2. Javna oblast se ne sme vmešavati v izvrševanje te pravice, razen če je to določeno z zakonom in nujno v demokratični družbi zaradi državne varnosti, javne varnosti ali ekonomske blaginje države, zato da se prepreči nered ali zločin, da se zavaruje zdravje ali morala ali da se zavarujejo pravice in svoboščine drugih ljudi.`

    Source:
    Uradni list Evropske unije C 303/17 - 14.12.2007
    Preamble - Explanations relating to the Charter of Fundamental Rights:
    V nadaljevanju navedena pojasnila so bila prvotno pripravljena pod vodstvom predsedstva Konvencije, ki je sestavilo Listino Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah. Ta pojasnila so bila posodobljena pod vodstvom predsedstva Evropske konvencije zaradi prilagoditve besedila Listine s strani omenjene konvencije (zlasti členov 51 in 52) in nadaljnjega razvoja prava Unije. Čeprav sama nimajo pravne veljave, so dragocena pomoč pri razlagi in pojasnjevanju določb Listine.
  • Nexans France and Nexans v European Commission
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Second Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:571
  • Plaintiff: Ž.B. Respondent/interested party: Civil Registry Division of Vilnius City Municipal Administration Authority issuing the opinion in the case: The State Commission of the Lithuanian Language
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Vilnius city district court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Ž.B. v. Civil Registry Division of Vilnius City Municipal Administration
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • The commercial MIRACLIA TELECOMUNICACIONES, S.L. against the STATE ADMINISTRATION.
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    The Spanish Supreme Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • European Commission v Hungary.
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Court (Grand Chamber)
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:476
  • Mr. … v. State of Luxembourg (anonymised judgment)
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Higher Administrative Court of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Mr T/France
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Court of Cassation
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:FR:CCASS:2020:CR00434
  • Nexans France and Nexans v European Commission
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    Court of Justice of the European Union
    Deciding body:
    Advocate General
    Type:
    Opinion
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:EU:C:2020:207
  • Dwyer vs. The Commissioner of An Garda Siochana, Minister for Communications, Energy and Natural Resources, Ireland and Attorney General
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    Supreme Court
    Type:
    Decision
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
  • Appeal for unconstitutionality filed by more than fifty members of the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea in the Congress of Deputies (the Spanish National Parliament), against Law 5/2018, of 11 June, amending Law 1/2000, of 7 January, on civil proceedings, in relation to the illegal occupation of housing
    Decision date:
    Deciding body type:
    National Court/Tribunal
    Deciding body:
    The Constitutional Court
    Type:
    Policy area:
    ECLI (European case law identifier):
    ECLI:ES:TC:2019:32

0 results found

0 results found

0 results found