Key facts of the case:
A physician born in 1951 wanted to apply for a new post as Statutory Health Insurance Physician (Vertragsarzt); a clause foresaw that applications of people over the age of 55 do not have to be considered: The Applicant filed a claim that this provision was against the prohibition of discrimination. Results (sanctions) and key consequences or implications of the case: The Supreme Court did not decide on sanctions. The mere reference to age is not a valid mean to reach the goal. This goal would have better been reached by postulating a specific minimum demand level or a specific equipment of the physician’s practice. Regarding the protection of uneconomical investions there are no public interests to be identified.