Austria / Supreme Administrative Court / 6Ob63/11z Right to informational self-determination, Dr. M.H. appeal against order of lower court

Key facts of the case:

The applicant saw an incompatibility between the disclosure requirement according to §277 ff of the Business Enterprise Code (Unternehmensgesetzbuch) and Article 8 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Results (sanctions) and key consequences or implications of the case: The Supreme Court did not decide on sanctions. The disclosure requirement does not contravene the law of the European Union after the coming into force of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Paragraphs referring to EU Charter: 



Deciding body (original language): 
Oberster Gerichtshof