Key facts of the case:
Appeal — EU trade mark — Whether appeals may be allowed to proceed — Article 170b of the Court’s Rules of Procedure — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue of law with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.
Outcome of the case:
On those grounds, the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) hereby orders:
8) By her second argument, the appellant submits that the General Court infringed the principle of legal certainty and Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’).
16) As regards, in the second place, the argument referred to in paragraph 8 of the present order, alleging that the General Court infringed the principle of legal certainty and Article 17 of the Charter, suffice it to note that the applicant has failed to explain what that alleged infringement consists in or to demonstrate how the alleged infringement of the aforementioned principle and provision, were it established, raises an issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law which justifies that the appeal be allowed to proceed.