Baltic Institute of Social Sciences (2017), Situation analysis of third country nationals in Latvia (Trešo valstu pilsoņu situācijas izpēte Latvijā)
Baltic Institute of Social Sciences (2017), Situation analysis of third country nationals in Latvia (Trešo valstu pilsoņu situācijas izpēte Latvijā)View full Research
Type of publication
Area/location of interest
Not applicable - national level
Type of Institution
Civil society organisation
Latvia, Baltic Institute of Social Sciences
Main Thematic Focus
Racism & xenophobia
Migrants People with migrant background
The aim of the report was to evaluate the situation of third country nationals and their integration in Latvia. According to the report concerning unequal treatment, third country nationals who are visibly different from Latvian nationals (nationals of Asian and other countries) experience discrimination more often than nationals and foreigners who are not visibly different (nationals of Russia, Ukraine, Belarus). 20% of third country nationals experienced unfair or offensive attitudes while residing in Latvia. 24% of respondents faced discriminatory attitude due to their nationality. 15% of third country nationals have experienced discriminatory attitude because of their ethnicity or religion. Persons with refugee and subsidiary protection status (nationals of Middle East, African, Asian countries) face discrimination in housing.
Methodology (Qualitative/Quantitative and exact type used, questionnaires etc)
quantitative and qualitative research: document analyses, statistical data analyses, quantitative survey (questionnaire), in-depth interviews
Sample details and representativeness
503 non-EU nationals residing in Latvia who filled in questionnaire. 25 in-depth interviews with 26 non-EU nationals and five interviews with seven persons with refugee or subsidiary protection status. 10 interviews with representatives of NGOs and municipal councils.
DISCLAIMERThe information presented here is collected under contract by the FRA's research network FRANET. The information and views contained do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA.