Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8
A.T. v. Austria
A.T. v. Austria AUT 21/06/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a public oral hearing in compensation proceedings for defamation under the Media Act. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-847
C.H. v. Austria
C.H. v. Austria AUT 03/01/2001 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Infringement of the presumption of innocence due to the refusal of the applicant s claim for compensation in respect of his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-811
KRONE VERLAG GMBH & CO. KG v. Austria (no. 2)
KRONE VERLAG GMBH CO. KG v. Austria no. 2 AUT 06/02/2004 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the imposition of a coercive indemnity under the Media Act for the failure to respect the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-917
LEWIT v. Austria
LEWIT v. Austria AUT 20/11/2019 00:00:00 09/12/2019 17:24:35 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / protection of one s reputation: Domestic courts failure to conduct a comprehensive assessment of a defamation claim as a matter EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54325
STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH v. Austria (no. 3)
STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH v. Austria no. 3 AUT 10/04/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Interference without sufficient and relevant reasons due to the awarding of compensation following the allegedly unlawful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-491
SZUCS v. Austria
SZUCS v. Austria AUT 24/11/1997 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial in compensation proceedings for the applicants detention on remand following the discontinuance of or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-733
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979