Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 8 of 8
EDELMAYER v. Austria
EDELMAYER v. Austria AUT 19/12/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Prohibition of double conviction: Conviction of the applicant by the administrative authorities for driving while drunk and subsequent conviction by the criminal courts for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-869
FREUNBERGER v. Austria
FREUNBERGER v. Austria AUT 19/12/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Prohibition of double conviction: Conviction of the applicant by the administrative authorities for driving while drunk and subsequent conviction by the criminal courts EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-871
H.R. v. Austria
H.R. v. Austria AUT 19/12/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Prohibition of double conviction: Conviction of the applicant by the administrative authorities for driving while drunk and subsequent conviction by the criminal courts for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-855
J. S. v. Austria
J. S. v. Austria AUT 19/12/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Prohibition of double conviction: Conviction of the applicant by the administrative authorities for driving while drunk and subsequent conviction by the criminal courts for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-865
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria AUT 07/03/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction for defamation under Section 111 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with section 33 of Media Act and prohibition to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1055
SCHWEIGHOFER AND OTHERS v. Austria
SCHWEIGHOFER AND OTHERS v. Austria AUT 09/01/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-571
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979