Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 28
AERTS v. Belgium
AERTS v. Belgium BEL 30/07/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / access to and effective functioning of justice: Lawfulness of the applicant s detention in a psychiatric wing of a prison pending his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1369
ALKOVIC v. Montenegro
ALKOVIC v. Montenegro MNE 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private life family and home: Failure to protect the applicant a Roma and a Muslim from a series of apparently ethnically and/or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49175
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BORGERS v. Belgium
BORGERS v. Belgium BEL 30/10/1991 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on the ground of the infringement of the principle of the equality of arms due to the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1297
C.M. v. Belgium
C.M. v. Belgium BEL 13/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to enforce judicial decisions ordering the applicant s neighbour to carry out rehabilitation work in order to comply with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49765
CAPEAU v. Belgium
CAPEAU v. Belgium BEL 06/06/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence on account of the Ministry of Justice s refusal upheld by the Appeals Board to grant a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1399
COTTIN v. Belgium
COTTIN v. Belgium BEL 02/09/2005 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to respect the adversarial principle in criminal proceedings for assault due to the establishment of an expert medical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1415
DE BRABANDERE v. Belgium
DE BRABANDERE v. Belgium BEL 03/01/1997 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the lack of opportunity for the applicants to respond to the conclusions of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1329
DECOOPMAN v. Belgium
DECOOPMAN v. Belgium BEL 08/09/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair disciplinary proceedings due to the lack of opportunity to respond to the conclusions of the representative of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1377
E.V.H. v. Belgium
E.V.H. v. Belgium BEL 23/09/1994 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Cour de Cassation due to the participation of a representative of the prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1331
EL HASKI v. Belgium
EL HASKI v. Belgium BEL 18/03/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Conviction based on statements possibly obtained in violation of Article 3: Conviction in 2007 for participation in activities of a terrorist organisation based merely on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1561
ESCOBAR LONDONO AND OTHERS v. Belgium
ESCOBAR LONDONO AND OTHERS v. Belgium BEL 27/09/1995 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings before the Cour de Cassation due to the lack of opportunity for the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1335
GUVEC v. Turkey
GUVEC v. Turkey TUR 20/04/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment for detaining the applicant a minor for five years in a prison for adults as well as the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37407
HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. Poland
HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20584
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary
ILIAS AND AHMED v. Hungary HUN 21/11/2019 00:00:00 28/11/2019 17:12:23 Case Description: The case of Ilias and Ahmed concerns the authorities failure to comply with their procedural obligation under Article 3 to assess the risks of ill treatment before EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54279
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
M.A. v. France
M.A. v. France FRA 02/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The M.A. case concerns the enforcement on 20 February 2015 of a removal order against the applicant an Algerian national who was sentenced in 2006 in France to seven years EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50021
M.S.S. v. Belgium
M.S.S. v. Belgium BEL 21/01/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the degrading treatment of the applicants asylum seekers or irregular migrants including unaccompanied minors 1 on account of their conditions of detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-41571
MUBILANZILA MAYEKA AND KANIKI MITUNGA v. Belgium
MUBILANZILA MAYEKA AND KANIKI MITUNGA v. Belgium BEL 12/01/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Detention and deportation of an unaccompanied foreign minor seeking to unite with her mother: excessive length and inadequate conditions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1497
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium BEL 10/07/2020 00:00:00 29/07/2020 17:07:09 Case Description: The Mugemangango case concerns the absence of a procedure offering adequate and sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrariness and to ensure effective examination of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55685