Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 39
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BRUNCRONA v. Finland
BRUNCRONA v. Finland FIN 16/02/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference on account of the procedure adopted in terminating the applicants proprietary interest in certain islands i.e. by a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4846
EKHOLM v. Finland
EKHOLM v. Finland FIN 24/10/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of administrative proceedings and failure to enforce final judicial decisions. Article 6 1 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5966
GRONMARK v. Finland
GRONMARK v. Finland FIN 06/10/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the absolute nature of the limitation period for bringing an action to establish paternity. Article 8 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5974
H.A.L. v. Finland
H.A.L. v. Finland FIN 07/07/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of administrative proceedings due to the failure to provide reasons for certain decisions and lack of sufficient EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4838
H.K. v. Finland
H.K. v. Finland FIN 26/12/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure of authorities to take formal decisions when placing a child in emergency care and inability of the applicant to contest access restrictions. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4770
HIRVISAARI v. Finland
HIRVISAARI v. Finland FIN 27/12/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of reasoning of the Pensions Board s and Insurance Court s decisions. Article 6 1 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4860
I v. Finland
I v. Finland FIN 17/10/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Authorities failure to protect patient records against unauthorised access by medical personnel of a public hospital as the records system in place did EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4940
JOKELA v. Finland
JOKELA v. Finland FIN 21/08/2002 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionated interference due to the discrepancy between the market value and the authorities and court s assessment of the market value of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4806
JUPPALA v. Finland
JUPPALA v. Finland FIN 02/03/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified conviction for defamation for having expressed suspicion that the applicant s son in law had ill treated his son the applicant s grand son EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4936
K.A. v. Finland
K.A. v. Finland FIN 14/04/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to take adequate measures to reunite the applicant parents and their three children following the children s placement in a foster family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4798
K. AND T. v. Finland
K. AND T. v. Finland FIN 12/07/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the placement of the applicants children in public care under emergency and normal orders failure to reunite EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4794
K.P. v. Finland
K.P. v. Finland FIN 31/08/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair administrative proceedings due to the failure to communicate to the applicant the opinions obtained ex officio concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4812
KALLIO v. Finland
KALLIO v. Finland FIN 22/10/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of tax surcharge proceedings due to the administrative courts refusal to hold oral hearings and to hear the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4922
KARHUVAARA AND ILTALEHTI v. Finland
KARHUVAARA AND ILTALEHTI v. Finland FIN 16/02/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to an editor in chie sf and a newspaper company s conviction to fines and damages for invasion of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4866
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
KOTILAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 17/12/2020 00:00:00 12/01/2021 13:34:45 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of police compliance with their duty of diligence on account of their failure to preventively confiscate a gun from a student whose internet EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56529
KUOPILA v. Finland
KUOPILA v. Finland FIN 27/07/2000 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms on the ground that material submitted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4800
LAUNIKARI v. Finland
LAUNIKARI v. Finland FIN 05/01/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4820
M.P. v. Finland
M.P. v. Finland FIN 15/03/2017 00:00:00 31/03/2017 16:56:44 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary interference due to the conviction of defamation for voicing concerns in a confidential conversation with a social worker about the possible EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46477
M.S. v. Finland
M.S. v. Finland FIN 22/06/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial as the applicant was not informed of a statement received by the appellate court and was not given the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4848