Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 16 of 16
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
EEROLA v. Finland
EEROLA v. Finland FIN 06/05/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the changing composition of the first instance court. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4850
HIRVISAARI v. Finland
HIRVISAARI v. Finland FIN 27/12/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of reasoning of the Pensions Board s and Insurance Court s decisions. Article 6 1 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4860
HYVONEN v. Finland
HYVONEN v. Finland FIN 22/07/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on account of the rejection of the medical reasons the applicant gave to justify his failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4864
K.U. v. Finland
K.U. v. Finland FIN 02/03/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Lack of effective protection due to the fact that the identity of the person who had posted an advertisement of a sexual nature about a minor could EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4902
KANGASLUOMA v. Finland
KANGASLUOMA v. Finland FIN 14/06/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and lack of respective remedy: Excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and in several cases also absence of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5000
KUOPILA v. Finland
KUOPILA v. Finland FIN 27/07/2000 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms on the ground that material submitted EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4800
LAUNIKARI v. Finland
LAUNIKARI v. Finland FIN 05/01/2001 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4820
LINDSTROM AND MASSELI v. Finland
LINDSTROM AND MASSELI v. Finland FIN 14/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the forced use of sealed overalls on two prisoners while in isolation that is from 13 to 16 November and from 9 to 16 May 2004 respectively. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6008
NUUTINEN v. Finland
NUUTINEN v. Finland FIN 27/06/2000 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of custody proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4816
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 27/12/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of Article 8 due to: 1. the search and seizure in 1999 and in 2009 of privileged material at the applicants law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5962
PITKANEN v. Finland
PITKANEN v. Finland FIN 09/06/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length and unfairness of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4808
SUOMINEN v. Finland
SUOMINEN v. Finland FIN 22/07/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial as the first instance court refused without reasoned decision to admit part of the evidence the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4830
T. AND OTHERS v. Finland
T. AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 13/03/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings lack of effective remedy in this respect one case concerns unfairness EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4796
VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 19/04/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of administrative proceedings and lack of an effective remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5964
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984