Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14
A.S. v. Finland
A.S. v. Finland FIN 28/12/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of adequate opportunity to put questions to the minor victim of an offence with respect to the latter s videotaped account EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5956
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BRUNCRONA v. Finland
BRUNCRONA v. Finland FIN 16/02/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference on account of the procedure adopted in terminating the applicants proprietary interest in certain islands i.e. by a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4846
JANATUINEN v. Finland
JANATUINEN v. Finland FIN 08/03/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of equality of arms and the breach of the applicant s right to adequate facilities for the preparation of his defence due to the destruction by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5988
K.A. v. Finland
K.A. v. Finland FIN 14/04/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to take adequate measures to reunite the applicant parents and their three children following the children s placement in a foster family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4798
KANGASLUOMA v. Finland
KANGASLUOMA v. Finland FIN 14/06/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and lack of respective remedy: Excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and in several cases also absence of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5000
MILD v. Finland
MILD v. Finland FIN 26/10/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings as the applicants could examine persons regarded as witnesses whose statements were taken into EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4840
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
PETRI SALLINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 27/12/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of Article 8 due to: 1. the search and seizure in 1999 and in 2009 of privileged material at the applicants law EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5962
R.H. v. Finland
R.H. v. Finland FIN 02/09/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the Appeal Court s failure to make a full examination of the case or to organise an oral EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4890
SUURIPAA v. Finland
SUURIPAA v. Finland FIN 12/04/2010 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure of the Supreme Court reversing the lower court s favourable judgment to hold an oral hearing and excessive length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4924
TAMMINEN v. Finland
TAMMINEN v. Finland FIN 05/07/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing on account of domestic courts refusal to hear a particular witness in two instances on different EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4842
THE FORTUM CORPORATION v. Finland
THE FORTUM CORPORATION v. Finland FIN 15/10/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings as the applicant company was not allowed by Supreme Administrative Court to submit comments EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4814
VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
VILHO ESKELINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 19/04/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of administrative proceedings and lack of an effective remedy. Articles 6 1 and 13 Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5964
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984