Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 16 of 16
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 13/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to freedom of expression due to criminal or civil convictions between 2000 and 2011 for invading the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5968
H.A.L. v. Finland
H.A.L. v. Finland FIN 07/07/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of administrative proceedings due to the failure to provide reasons for certain decisions and lack of sufficient EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4838
K.U. v. Finland
K.U. v. Finland FIN 02/03/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Lack of effective protection due to the fact that the identity of the person who had posted an advertisement of a sexual nature about a minor could EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4902
KALLIO v. Finland
KALLIO v. Finland FIN 22/10/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of tax surcharge proceedings due to the administrative courts refusal to hold oral hearings and to hear the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4922
KANGASLUOMA v. Finland
KANGASLUOMA v. Finland FIN 14/06/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and lack of respective remedy: Excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and in several cases also absence of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5000
KAURA v. Finland
KAURA v. Finland FIN 23/09/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of administrative proceedings due to a refusal by the Insurance Court to hold an oral hearing. The proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4950
LOMASEITA OY AND OTHERS v. Finland
LOMASEITA OY AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 05/10/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms as the applicants were EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4854
M.S. v. Finland
M.S. v. Finland FIN 22/06/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial as the applicant was not informed of a statement received by the appellate court and was not given the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4848
MILD v. Finland
MILD v. Finland FIN 26/10/2005 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings as the applicants could examine persons regarded as witnesses whose statements were taken into EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4840
NYKANEN v. Finland
NYKANEN v. Finland FIN 20/08/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the right not to be punished twice as the applicants were convicted in both criminal and administrative taxation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6022
R.H. v. Finland
R.H. v. Finland FIN 02/09/2009 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the Appeal Court s failure to make a full examination of the case or to organise an oral EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4890
S. H. v. Finland
S. H. v. Finland FIN 29/10/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of medical insurance proceedings due to the inability for the applicant to comment on two medical opinions included EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4990
THE FORTUM CORPORATION v. Finland
THE FORTUM CORPORATION v. Finland FIN 15/10/2003 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings as the applicant company was not allowed by Supreme Administrative Court to submit comments EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4814
V. v. Finland
V. v. Finland FIN 24/07/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: Unfair criminal proceedings where the applicant was unable to argue that he had been incited by the police to commit a drug offence because the police authorities failed to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5960
X v. Finland
X v. Finland FIN 19/11/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: This case concerns the involuntary confinement of the applicant for care in a mental hospital between 17 February 2005 and 27 January 2006 without sufficient safeguards against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5984