Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14
ALTHOFF AND OTHERS v. Germany
ALTHOFF AND OTHERS v. Germany DEU 08/03/2012 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of property: Amendment in 1998 with retrospective effect of the statutory time limit originally set for 31/12/1992 for filing restitution claims under EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38452
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
EL-MASRI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
EL MASRI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 13/12/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention protection against ill treatment protection of private life: In the context of a secret rendition EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6448
ELSHOLZ v. Germany
ELSHOLZ v. Germany DEU 13/07/2000 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / access to and effective functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to the domestic court s refusal to grant the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38316
GARCIA ALVA v. Germany
GARCIA ALVA v. Germany DEU 13/02/2001 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms in proceedings concerning the lawfulness of the applicant s detention on remand due EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38308
HOFFMANN v. Germany
HOFFMANN v. Germany DEU 11/01/2002 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private life / access to and effective functioning of justice: Unjustified interference due to the applicant s inability to get access to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38328
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
LIETZOW v. Germany
LIETZOW v. Germany DEU 13/02/2001 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms in proceedings concerning the lawfulness of the applicant s detention on remand due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38310
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium BEL 10/07/2020 00:00:00 29/07/2020 17:07:09 Case Description: The Mugemangango case concerns the absence of a procedure offering adequate and sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrariness and to ensure effective examination of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55685
NIKOLOUDAKIS v. Greece
NIKOLOUDAKIS v. Greece GRC 26/07/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: This case concerns the violation of the applicants right of acess to a court on account of the authorities failure between 1998 and 2011 to give effect to civil and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55717
SAHIN v. Germany
SAHIN v. Germany DEU 08/07/2003 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life and discriminatory treatment due to the dismissal of requests for access of parents to their children born out of wedlock and in one case denial of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38320
SCHOPS v. Germany
SCHOPS v. Germany DEU 13/02/2001 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Infringement of the principle of equality of arms in proceedings concerning the lawfulness of the applicant s detention on remand due to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38312
STAMBUK v. Germany
STAMBUK v. Germany DEU 17/01/2003 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s disciplinary punishment by the Court for Medical Practitioners following a publication on his work EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38338
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany
WOLTER AND SARFERT v. Germany DEU 23/06/2017 00:00:00 12/07/2017 17:01:36 Case Description: Discriminatory interference with the right to protection of property in that the applicants born out of wedlock in 1943 and 1940 respectively were unable to assert EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47447