Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 14 of 14
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BELLER v. Poland
BELLER v. Poland POL 06/06/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of proceedings before administrative courts and bodies violations of Article 6 1 . The case of Wcis o and Cabaj also concerns EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17662
BISTIEVA AND OTHERS v. Poland
BISTIEVA AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 10/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to provide sufficient reasons to justify the administrative detention in 2014 for five months and twenty days of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50019
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the absence of an effective mechanism to enforce the applicant s right to compensation reaffirmed in the Land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17801
CZAJKOWSKA AND OTHERS v. Poland
CZAJKOWSKA AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 13/10/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Excessive length of administrative proceedings concerning compensation for nationalized property violation of Article 6 1 and infringement of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20598
KITA v. Poland
KITA v. Poland POL 08/10/2008 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to court decisions in summary proceedings based on the Local Elections Act. Article 10 Status of Execution: Case closed. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18085
KOSC v. Poland
KOSC v. Poland POL 01/09/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction to issue an apology in civil proceedings for infringement of personal rights following allegations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47685
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland POL 02/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive use of force by the Police during the applicants arrest in February 2015 and ineffective investigation in the circumstances of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59191
KWIECIEN v. Poland
KWIECIEN v. Poland POL 09/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to regional court s order in defamation proceedings under the Law on Local Elections to publish in a local newspaper EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18033
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland
POTOMSKA AND POTOMSKI v. Poland POL 15/09/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Since 1987 the applicants have been prevented from developing their plot of land following a decision to classify it as a historic monument on the grounds that a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20604
SKIBINSCY v. Poland
SKIBINSCY v. Poland POL 26/03/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Impossibility to build on land designated for public use in local development plans and thus for expropriation at some undetermined date EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18011
VASILESCU v. Belgium
VASILESCU v. Belgium BEL 20/04/2015 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: These cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to the following material conditions of their detention taken as a whole violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1262
WIZERKANIUK v. Poland
WIZERKANIUK v. Poland POL 05/10/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the criminal conviction of a chief editor and co owner of a local newspaper for the publication of an interview EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20600
ZIEMBINSKI v. Poland (no. 2)
ZIEMBINSKI v. Poland no. 2 POL 05/10/2016 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:26:58 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the severity of a criminal sanction applied to a newspaper owner and editor following a critical article EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39915