Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 19 of 19
COLACO MESTRE v. Portugal
COLACO MESTRE v. Portugal PRT 26/07/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Interference with freedom of expression on account of criminal convictions of journalists and a researcher for defamation or violation of the judicial secret. Status EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9647
DE ALMEIDA AZEVEDO v. Portugal
DE ALMEIDA AZEVEDO v. Portugal PRT 23/04/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of a politician in criminal libel proceedings to pay a fine and damages to a mayor he EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9643
L.P. AND CARVALHO v. Portugal
L.P. AND CARVALHO v. Portugal PRT 08/10/2019 00:00:00 14/10/2019 17:04:30 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of two lawyers for defamation L.P. and for attacking a person s honour Carvalho in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52983
LOPES GOMES DA SILVA v. Portugal
LOPES GOMES DA SILVA v. Portugal PRT 28/12/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant s conviction for defamation following the publication of an editorial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9425
MAIRE v. Portugal
MAIRE v. Portugal PRT 26/09/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unlawful interference due to the authorities failure to enforce judicial decisions relating to the exercise by the applicant of custody of his child EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9963
MEDIPRESS-SOCIEDADE JORNALISTICA, LDA v. Portugal
MEDIPRESS SOCIEDADE JORNALISTICA LDA v. Portugal PRT 30/11/2016 00:00:00 16/12/2016 16:49:23 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the conviction of the applicants in civil or criminal proceedings to pay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45765
NASR AND GHALI v. Italy
NASR AND GHALI v. Italy ITA 23/05/2016 00:00:00 30/01/2018 12:28:48 Case Description: The case concerns violations arising from an extraordinary rendition operation against the first applicant an Egyptian cleric suspected of terrorism related offences EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28282
PAIS PIRES DE LIMA v. Portugal
PAIS PIRES DE LIMA v. Portugal PRT 12/05/2019 00:00:00 01/07/2019 15:02:08 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate and unnecessary interference due to the amount of compensation awarded in a civil judgment ordering a lawyer to pay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52353
PATRICIO MONTEIRO TELO DE ABREU v. Portugal
PATRICIO MONTEIRO TELO DE ABREU v. Portugal PRT 10/10/2022 00:00:00 28/10/2022 18:21:13 Case Description: The case concerns an unjustified interference with the freedom of expression of the applicant in criminal proceedings ended in 2015 with his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61714
PINTO PINHEIRO MARQUES v. Portugal
PINTO PINHEIRO MARQUES v. Portugal PRT 24/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Interference with freedom of expression on account of criminal convictions of journalists and a researcher for defamation or violation of the judicial secret. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9903
PUBLICO - COMUNICACAO SOCIAL, S.A. AND OTHERS v. Portugal
PUBLICO COMUNICACAO SOCIAL S.A. AND OTHERS v. Portugal PRT 07/03/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:15:57 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with freedom of expression: Civil judgment ordering a newspaper and four of its staff to pay severe EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10053
RAMOS FERREIRA AND OTHERS v. Portugal
RAMOS FERREIRA AND OTHERS v. Portugal PRT 09/12/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with property rights: Excessive delay in determining and paying compensation following the expropriation of agricultural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9987
ROLIM COMERCIAL, S.A. v. Portugal
ROLIM COMERCIAL S.A. v. Portugal PRT 16/07/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:51:34 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the occupancy of part of her land by the authorities in 1991 with no formal act of transfer of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8781
SALGUEIRO SILVA MOUTA v. Portugal
SALGUEIRO SILVA MOUTA v. Portugal PRT 21/03/2000 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Protection of family life / discrimination: Interference and discriminatory treatment of the applicant on account of the domestic courts decision conferring on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9381
SOARES DE MELO v. Portugal
SOARES DE MELO v. Portugal PRT 16/05/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:51:34 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the placement of a mother s six children for adoption on grounds of mother s poverty and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8853
URBINO RODRIGUES v. Portugal
URBINO RODRIGUES v. Portugal PRT 01/03/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to convictions to pay fines or damages for defamation following the publication of a response to polemical EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9625
WELSH AND SILVA CANHA v. Portugal
WELSH AND SILVA CANHA v. Portugal PRT 30/08/2022 00:00:00 02/09/2022 10:09:44 Case Description: This case concerns an unjustified interference with the freedom of expression of the applicants journalists and respectively the editor and deputy editor of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61009
WOMEN ON WAVES AND OTHERS v. Portugal
WOMEN ON WAVES AND OTHERS v. Portugal PRT 03/05/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the decision of the administrative authorities to prohibit the ship Borndiep which had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9671
X AND Y v. Romania
X AND Y v. Romania ROU 19/04/2021 00:00:00 30/04/2021 16:08:47 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private live on account of the absence of a clear and foreseeable legal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57459