Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 21
AINSWORTH v. the United Kingdom
AINSWORTH v. the United Kingdom GBR 27/01/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings before the Court Marial due to its lack of impartiality and independence and absence of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2532
BASMENKOVA v. Bulgaria
BASMENKOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 06/04/2017 00:00:00 06/04/2017 16:13:56 Case Description: This group of cases concerns failure to provide the applicants with compensation for expropriations which took place during the 1980s or the early 1990s. The applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46613
ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ERDOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 13/09/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:29:41 Case Description: The cases mainly concern the deaths of the applicants next of kin as a result of unjustified and excessive force used by members of the security forces during EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37076
GENC AND DEMIRGAN v. Turkey
GENC AND DEMIRGAN v. Turkey TUR 10/10/2017 00:00:00 12/10/2017 16:39:24 Case Description: This group of cases concern the failure of the national authorities to comply with numerous administrative court decisions delivered in favour of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47927
ISAAK v. Turkey
ISAAK v. Turkey TUR 24/09/2008 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37298
KAKOULLI v. Turkey
KAKOULLI v. Turkey TUR 22/02/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: The Kakoulli group concerns the killings of two Greek Cypriot men in 1996 due to excessive use of firearms by Turkish or Turkish Cypriot military security forces along the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37260
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria BGR 18/04/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Most of these cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicants in penitentiary facilities between 1996 and 2019 in particular owing to overcrowding poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3589
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 01/07/2014 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of proceedings before civil courts and administrative bodies between 1996 and 2021. The European Court criticised in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-261
MARTIN v. the United Kingdom
MARTIN v. the United Kingdom GBR 24/01/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of independence and impartiality of certain court martial proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2604
MILLER v. the United Kingdom
MILLER v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/01/2005 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of the Army court martial which judged the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2636
MORRIS* v. the United Kingdom
MORRIS v. the United Kingdom GBR 26/05/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of the Army court martial which judged the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2592
POLYAKH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
POLYAKH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 24/02/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:03 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants right to respect for their private and family life which has been violated as a result of lustration violation of the Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54941
ROJAS MORALES v. Italy
ROJAS MORALES v. Italy ITA 16/02/2001 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of impartiality of a criminal court due to the judges previous involvement in proceedings against a co accused of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42937
ROMANOV v. Russia
ROMANOV v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 16/07/2019 16:31:11 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to private life on account of impossibility to institute proceedings to contest paternity because when the applicant had obtained evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52459
SHOFMAN v. Russia
SHOFMAN v. Russia RUS 24/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to the rejection of the applicant s claim challenging the legal presumption of his paternity as time barred. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27582
SMOKOVITIS AND OTHERS v. Greece
SMOKOVITIS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 11/07/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Unfair proceedings between the applicants and the state polytechnic school of Piraeus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22184
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania
SOARE AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 22/05/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deaths life threatening injuries or ill treatment during arrest and other law enforcement operations. The facts occurred between 2000 and 2009. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12812
XENIDES-ARESTIS v. Turkey
XENIDES ARESTIS v. Turkey TUR 22/03/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: These cases concern the continuous denial of access to property in the northern part of Cyprus and the consequent loss of control thereof Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37308