Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 153
A.B. v. the Netherlands
A.B. v. the Netherlands NLD 29/04/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Unjustified interference due to the control of a detainee s correspondence with the European Commission of Human Rights by prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4373
ABDURASHIDOVA v. Russia
ABDURASHIDOVA v. Russia RUS 04/10/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Action of security forces: Illegal killings absence of effective remedy illegal searches unfair trial and violation of property rights in the context of actions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14128
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia
ABUYEVA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern mainly violations resulting from or relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14124
AERTS v. Belgium
AERTS v. Belgium BEL 30/07/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / access to and effective functioning of justice: Lawfulness of the applicant s detention in a psychiatric wing of a prison pending his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1369
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy
AGRATI AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 28/11/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the retroactive application of Law No. 266/2005 to pending judicial proceedings concerning the approximately 310 applicants length of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28264
AKA v. Turkey
AKA v. Turkey TUR 23/09/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26578
AKKUS v. Turkey
AKKUS v. Turkey TUR 09/07/1997 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5460
ALIEV v. Ukraine
ALIEV v. Ukraine UKR 29/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/conditions of detention protection of private and family life/freedom of religion and lack of a remedy: poor conditions of detention for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31304
ANDERSON v. the United Kingdom
ANDERSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 20/02/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of property: Discriminatory treatment on grounds of gender between widows and widowers regarding social security benefits and/or an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2786
ANDRIC v. Croatia
ANDRIC v. Croatia HRV 17/11/2005 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of access to a court due to legislation of 1996 and 1999 staying all civil proceedings concerning claims for damages in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12231
ANTONETTO v. Italy
ANTONETTO v. Italy ITA 20/10/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Denial of a fair trial due to the failure to enforce of a judicial decision ordering the demolition EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45092
ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 28/10/1998 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention protection against detention lack of a remedy: Lack of judicial review of the decision to detain the applicant on remand and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14265
ATCA AND OTHERS v. Turkey
ATCA AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 06/05/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:10:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lacking independence and impartiality of court due to the presence of a military judge on the bench of the state EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28913
B.B. v. the United Kingdom
B.B. v. the United Kingdom GBR 07/07/2004 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of private life: Discriminatory treatment on the ground of the applicant s sexual orientation due to this indictment for committing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3029
BALOGH v. Hungary
BALOGH v. Hungary HUN 20/10/2004 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Alleged ill treatment by police officers during interrogation and failure to provide a plausible explanation for the injuries despite an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11286
BEER MARIE-LUISE v. Austria
BEER MARIE LUISE v. Austria AUT 18/05/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings on account of the absence of a public hearing in proceedings before the authorities competent for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-685
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BIBA v. Greece
BIBA v. Greece GRC 26/12/2000 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to the applicant s inability to file an appeal on points of law before the Court of Cassation as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22164
BLACKGROVE v. the United Kingdom
BLACKGROVE v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/07/2009 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of property and discrimination: Discriminatory treatment on grounds of gender between widows and widowers regarding social security benefits and/or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2909
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173