Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 25
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
BELLER v. Poland
BELLER v. Poland POL 06/06/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of proceedings before administrative courts and bodies violations of Article 6 1 . The case of Wcis o and Cabaj also concerns EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17662
ELAWA v. Turkey
ELAWA v. Turkey TUR 20/06/2011 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: Excessive length of criminal proceedings from 30 May 2001 2 March 2006 four years and nine months at two levels of jurisdiction violation of Article 6 1 and lack of access to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37274
FREZADOU v. Greece
FREZADOU v. Greece GRC 08/02/2019 00:00:00 25/02/2019 15:58:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the domestic courts failure to consider the applicant s request for annulment of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51513
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.D. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:43:32 Case Description: This group of cases concerns poor material conditions of detention in establishments under the authority of the Ministries of the Interior and Justice and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13946
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KEDZIOR v. Poland
KEDZIOR v. Poland POL 16/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Lack of review of the lawfulness of placing and detaining a person in a care unit such as a social care home and denial of direct access to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20612
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania
LULI AND OTHERS v. Albania ALB 01/07/2014 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: These cases concern the excessive length of proceedings before civil courts and administrative bodies between 1996 and 2021. The European Court criticised in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-261
M.A. AND OTHERS v. Lithuania
M.A. AND OTHERS v. Lithuania LTU 11/03/2019 00:00:00 03/04/2019 16:35:04 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the State Border Guard Service to allow the applicants to submit asylum applications at border check points and their return to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51869
M.K. AND OTHERS v. Poland
M.K. AND OTHERS v. Poland POL 14/12/2020 00:00:00 12/01/2021 13:34:45 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the Convention on account of refusals of border guards to receive asylum application from the applicants on various occasions between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56535
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
MARTYNENKO v. Ukraine
MARTYNENKO v. Ukraine UKR 24/02/2022 00:00:00 25/02/2022 11:14:30 Case Description: The case concerns the conviction of the applicant in 2012 on a drug dealing charge for which the prosecutor had admitted to lack evidence. After the applicant s conviction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59735
MATEESCU v. Romania
MATEESCU v. Romania ROU 14/04/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unlawful interference due to refusal of the Bucharest Bar to allow the applicant to practice simultaneously as a doctor and lawyer on the basis EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13187
MOUSTAHI v. France
MOUSTAHI v. France FRA 25/09/2020 00:00:00 28/10/2020 12:05:36 Case Description: This case concerns the measures taken following the illegal entry into Mayotte French department in the Indian Ocean of the first applicant s children legally resident there EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56109
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine
OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. Ukraine UKR 27/05/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns a number of issues related to the independence and impartiality of the judiciary. The Oleksandr Volkov case concerns four violations of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31281
P. AND S. v. Poland
P. AND S. v. Poland POL 30/01/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20614
R.R. v. Poland
R.R. v. Poland POL 28/11/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These three cases concern the lack of effective access to lawful abortion in Poland. The Tysi c and R.R. cases concern the lack of effective procedural mechanisms to enable the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20596