Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 37
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression on account of domestic court orders blocking access to Google Sites and YouTube EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37256
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BAKA v. Hungary
BAKA v. Hungary HUN 23/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The European Court found violations of the Convention on account of the undue and premature termination of the applicants mandates as President Baka case and Vice President Erm EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10859
CLIFT v. the United Kingdom
CLIFT v. the United Kingdom GBR 22/11/2010 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and discrimination: Unjustified discrimination in the conditions for allowing early release between prisoners serving fixed term EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2911
DEMIR AND BAYKARA v. Turkey
DEMIR AND BAYKARA v. Turkey TUR 12/11/2008 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Freedom of association: Interference with the exercise by municipal civil servants of their right to form a trade union and to negotiate collective agreements EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5500
DENISOVA AND MOISEYEVA v. Russia
DENISOVA AND MOISEYEVA v. Russia RUS 04/10/2010 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the lack of a proper judicial review of the confiscation measures imposed on the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13757
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
GEDRIMAS v. Lithuania
GEDRIMAS v. Lithuania LTU 12/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment/action by security forces: Ill treatment by the police and lack of effective investigations. Article 3 substantive and procedural limb EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39549
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
GERASIMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 01/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the failure or serious delay of the state and municipal authorities in abiding by final domestic judicial decisions concerning in kind EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14126
GUTHMUNDUR ANDRI ASTRATHSSON v. Iceland
GUTHMUNDUR ANDRI ASTRATHSSON v. Iceland ISL 01/12/2020 00:00:00 03/12/2020 16:50:01 Case Description: Judicial appointment procedure: Infringement of the applicant s right to a tribunal established by law in proceedings before the newly established Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56369
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia
IDENTOBA AND OTHERS v. Georgia GEO 12/08/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: These cases concern: degrading treatment of the applicants on account of abusive and humiliating police conduct motivated by homophobic and/or transphobic hatred EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5894
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31596
KAVERZIN v. Ukraine
KAVERZIN v. Ukraine UKR 15/08/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31569
KHAYLO v. Ukraine
KHAYLO v. Ukraine UKR 13/02/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: These cases concern procedural violations of Article 2 of the Convention on account of the lack of effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants relatives caused EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33459
KINGSLEY v. the United Kingdom
KINGSLEY v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/05/2002 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the lack of independence and impartiality of the Gaming Board which revoked the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2246
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
L. v. Lithuania
L. v. Lithuania LTU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private life on account of the absence of implementing legislation to regulate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4320
MEIMANIS v. Latvia
MEIMANIS v. Latvia LVA 21/10/2015 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Interference due to interception of telephone conversations without the ex post facto judicial approval for the interception of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12694