Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 94
A.B.V. v. Russia
A.B.V. v. Russia RUS 02/01/2019 00:00:00 24/01/2019 10:13:38 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former partners and one EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51193
ADEISHVILI (MAZMISHVILI) v. Russia
ADEISHVILI MAZMISHVILI v. Russia RUS 16/01/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicant on account of the overcrowded conditions of his detention in the special detention centre for foreigners in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14044
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine UKR 05/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of family life: Unlawful and lengthy involuntary confinement in a psychiatric hospital following a wrong diagnosis and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31202
ALIYEV v. Russia
ALIYEV v. Russia RUS 10/04/2018 00:00:00 20/06/2018 12:04:54 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: Poor conditions of detention in the detention facilities under the authority of the Ministry of Justice lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49683
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
BOYKO v. Russia
BOYKO v. Russia RUS 20/02/2018 00:00:00 09/03/2018 16:28:42 Case Description: Violation of the right to freedom of religion because during the applicant s detention on remand in Moscow in 2007 and 2008 the investigator refused him to see priests Article 9 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49083
BUNTOV v. Russia
BUNTOV v. Russia RUS 09/05/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The cases in this group mainly concern torture and ill treatment inflicted in the penitentiary facilities and their ineffective investigation substantive and procedural EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14152
BURES v. the Czech Republic
BURES v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/01/2013 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:15:20 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Restraint and fastening of the applicant to a bed at Brno ernovice psychiatric hospital s sobering up centre and insufficiently EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35
C. v. Croatia
C. v. Croatia HRV 08/01/2021 00:00:00 29/01/2021 19:13:35 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference on account of a minor s flawed representation and failure to hear his views in custody proceedings. Article 8 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56653
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
CORALLO v. the Netherlands
CORALLO v. the Netherlands NLD 09/10/2018 00:00:00 18/10/2018 16:08:29 Case Description: This case concerns the poor conditions of the applicant s detention in the Philipsburg Police Station on Sint Maarten situated in the Caribbean where he was detained EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50579
COSTEL GACIU v. Romania
COSTEL GACIU v. Romania ROU 23/09/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention discrimination: Degrading treatment due to conditions of detention in Cluj detention centre and Gherla Prison refusal of his requests EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17605
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania ROU 19/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13455
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
DANILCZUK v. Cyprus
DANILCZUK v. Cyprus CYP 03/07/2018 00:00:00 07/08/2018 10:05:42 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment of the applicant due to the poor conditions of his detention at Nicosia Central Prisons from September 2010 until his release in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50007
DVOYNYKH v. Ukraine
DVOYNYKH v. Ukraine UKR 12/02/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:35:22 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment conditions of detention: Poor conditions of detention and inadequate access to medical care in police holding facilities pre trial detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28340
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
FELDMAN (NO. 2) v. Ukraine
FELDMAN NO. 2 v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2012 00:00:00 07/11/2016 12:29:57 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Authorities refusal to allow the applicant family visits and to attend his father s funeral whilst in pre trial detention due to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25634
FRASIK v. Poland
FRASIK v. Poland POL 05/04/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Right to marry lack of an effective remedy and protection of rights in detention: Disproportionate interference due to lack of restraint displayed by the national judge in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20590