Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 41
ALIM v. Russia
ALIM v. Russia RUS 27/12/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the right to respect for the applicants family life a Cameroonian national Alim and an Azerbaijani national Guliyev and Sheina in the event of their administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14140
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BJEDOV v. Croatia
BJEDOV v. Croatia HRV 29/08/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Disproportionate interference on account of the domestic courts decisions ordering the applicants to leave State owned flats failing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12035
CESTARO v. Italy
CESTARO v. Italy ITA 07/07/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of four judgments and two decisions friendly settlements with undertakings concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants at the hands of State agents and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28298
CONKA v. Belgium
CONKA v. Belgium BEL 05/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / expulsion / prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens: Arrest of Slovakian nationals and asylum seekers of Roma origin with a view to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1477
DICKSON v. the United Kingdom
DICKSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 04/12/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the Home Secretary s refusal to grant a prisoner serving a life sentence and his wife their request EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2810
DZHAKSYBERGENOV (AKA JAXYBERGENOV) v. Ukraine
DZHAKSYBERGENOV AKA JAXYBERGENOV v. Ukraine UKR 20/06/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Unlawful ban to leave the territory in the context of extradition proceedings with regard to the first applicant / EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31267
GIOSAKIS v. Greece (n° 1)
GIOSAKIS v. Greece n 1 GRC 12/05/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Refusal of the applicants request for leave to appear in person before the Indictment Division and the investigating judge whilst the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15595
GOSAV AND OTHERS v. Romania
GOSAV AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the right to a family life of the applicants who serve prison sentences and were denied in 2017 the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55303
HAJIBEYLI v. Azerbaijan
HAJIBEYLI v. Azerbaijan AZE 10/10/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: This group of three cases concerns violations of the applicants right to freedom of movement violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 . In the cases of Hajibeyli and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1868
IVANOV v. Ukraine
IVANOV v. Ukraine UKR 07/03/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The cases of the present group concern the unjustified restriction to the right to liberty of movement in connection with the undertaking not to abscond given by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31094
K.O. AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
K.O. AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/02/2022 00:00:00 25/02/2022 11:14:30 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Alleged interference due to a deportation order made against the applicants father following his conviction for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59757
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. Russia
KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. Russia RUS 22/03/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the discrimination of the applicants military serviceman and police officers on account of different conditions for parental leave based on their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13956
KOVALEV v. Russia
KOVALEV v. Russia RUS 12/11/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the principles of adversarial proceedings and equality of arms in civil proceedings initiated by or against the applicants in detention on account of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13621
KUDESHKINA v. Russia
KUDESHKINA v. Russia RUS 14/09/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to disciplinary proceedings leading to her dismissal in 2004 from judicial office for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13926
KULIKOWSKI v. Poland
KULIKOWSKI v. Poland POL 21/03/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of rights in detention: Lack of access to a court due to a legal aid lawyer s refusal to lodge a cassation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18277
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213