Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 100
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine
AKOPYAN v. Ukraine UKR 05/09/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and of family life: Unlawful and lengthy involuntary confinement in a psychiatric hospital following a wrong diagnosis and lack of effective EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31202
ALIYEV v. Ukraine
ALIYEV v. Ukraine UKR 10/06/2021 00:00:00 11/06/2021 17:47:07 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unjustified interference due to the revocation in 2010 of the applicant s residence permit and the issuance of an expulsion order with a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57741
ANATOLIY RUDENKO v. Ukraine
ANATOLIY RUDENKO v. Ukraine UKR 17/07/2014 00:00:00 07/11/2016 13:25:41 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful detention and excessive length of detention on remand as well as the lack of judicial review compatible with the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-25785
ARCELORMITTAL AMBALAJ CELIGI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI v. Ukraine
ARCELORMITTAL AMBALAJ CELIGI SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI v. Ukraine UKR 15/07/2021 00:00:00 06/08/2021 16:22:04 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings on account of the domestic courts failure to address the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58183
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine
ARSKAYA v. Ukraine UKR 05/03/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns principally the failure of the domestic authorities to carry out effective investigations into allegations of medical negligence by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31636
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BELOUSOV v. Ukraine
BELOUSOV v. Ukraine UKR 07/02/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Details of this case together with status of execution can be found under the case of KAVERZIN http://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng i 004 31569 Status of Execution: Details of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32054
BENDERSKIY v. Ukraine
BENDERSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2008 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a fair trial due to the domestic courts failure to consider an argument of substance advanced by the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31334
BUDIVELNO INVESTYTSIYNA GRUPA 1 v. Ukraine
BUDIVELNO INVESTYTSIYNA GRUPA 1 v. Ukraine UKR 17/12/2020 00:00:00 18/12/2020 10:22:22 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive burden on the applicant company imposed by the actions of the authorities through the re classification in 2008 of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56505
BULANOV v. Ukraine
BULANOV v. Ukraine UKR 09/03/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the Supreme Court s and Higher Administrative Court s refusals to accept jurisdiction and to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31639
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
CHERNIKA v. Ukraine
CHERNIKA v. Ukraine UKR 12/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: Denial of a fair trial on account of the applicant s conviction on the basis of statements of witnesses whom the applicant was not able to confront. Article 6 1 and 3d EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55555
DIYA 97 v. Ukraine
DIYA 97 v. Ukraine UKR 21/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of commercial proceedings and infringement of the principle of legal certainty due to the Supreme Court s disregard EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31132
EDITORIAL BOARD OF PRAVOYE DELO AND SHTEKEL v. Ukraine
EDITORIAL BOARD OF PRAVOYE DELO AND SHTEKEL v. Ukraine UKR 05/08/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference due to the court ordering a newspaper s editorial board and its editor in chief to apologise EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31614
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
G.S. v. Georgia
G.S. v. Georgia GEO 21/10/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:07:28 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the Georgian courts to properly implement the 1980 Hague Convention concerning the civil aspects of international child abduction. Concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5896
GOLIMBIYEVSKIY v. Ukraine
GOLIMBIYEVSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 20/07/2017 00:00:00 07/12/2017 16:59:15 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawfulness and excessive length of detention on remand as well as the lack of judicial review and of an enforceable right to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48343
GONGADZE v. Ukraine
GONGADZE v. Ukraine UKR 08/02/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure in 2000 to protect the life of the applicant s husband. The latter a journalist known for his criticism of those in power had been EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31344