Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7
EISENSTECKEN v. Austria
EISENSTECKEN v. Austria AUT 03/10/2000 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Absence of a public hearing in administrative proceedings before the authorities competent for real property transactions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-831
KLEIN v. Austria
KLEIN v. Austria AUT 03/06/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of property: Deprivation of a lawyer who had lost the right to practice as a result of bankruptcy proceedings and a criminal conviction of all entitlements to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-961
MOSER v. Austria
MOSER v. Austria AUT 21/12/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference due to transfer of custody of a child to the Youth Welfare Office EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1033
RAMBAUSKE v. Austria
RAMBAUSKE v. Austria AUT 28/04/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Excessive length of civil and criminal administrative proceedings and lack of effective remedy thereof Status of Execution: The Austrian administrative court system has EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1109
SEVERE v. Austria
SEVERE v. Austria AUT 21/12/2017 00:00:00 09/02/2018 11:08:46 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising from his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48763
W.R. v. Austria
W.R. v. Austria AUT 21/12/1999 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before disciplinary courts and the Constitutional Court. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-803
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967