Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7
CIFTCI v. Austria
CIFTCI v. Austria AUT 20/08/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant being sentenced to a prohibition of residence following a conviction for drugs EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-777
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria AUT 07/03/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction for defamation under Section 111 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with section 33 of Media Act and prohibition to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1055
SEVERE v. Austria
SEVERE v. Austria AUT 21/12/2017 00:00:00 09/02/2018 11:08:46 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for his family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising from his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48763
STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH v. Austria (no. 3)
STANDARD VERLAGS GMBH v. Austria no. 3 AUT 10/04/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Interference without sufficient and relevant reasons due to the awarding of compensation following the allegedly unlawful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-491
VISY v. Slovakia
VISY v. Slovakia SVK 18/03/2019 00:00:00 05/04/2019 11:14:01 Case Description: The case concerns the re seizure by the Slovakian authorities in 2012 of items belonging to an Austrian businessman at the request of the Austrian authorities. The Court deemed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51885
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979