Search
Data source
EU member states
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 7 of 7
COORPLAN-JENNI GMBH AND HASCIC v. Austria
COORPLAN JENNI GMBH AND HASCIC v. Austria AUT 11/12/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of an oral hearing to companies before the Administrative Court in proceedings concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1015
OSTERREICHISCHE VEREINIGUNG ZUR ERHALTUNG, STARKUNG UND SCHAFFUNG... v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHE VEREINIGUNG ZUR ERHALTUNG STARKUNG UND SCHAFFUNG... v. Austria AUT 28/02/2014 00:00:00 25/10/2016 10:47:41 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unnecessary interference due to the insufficiently reasoned refusal by a regional authority EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-493
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria
OSTERREICHISCHER RUNDFUNK v. Austria AUT 07/03/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Conviction for defamation under Section 111 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with section 33 of Media Act and prohibition to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1055
RAMBAUSKE v. Austria
RAMBAUSKE v. Austria AUT 28/04/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Excessive length of civil and criminal administrative proceedings and lack of effective remedy thereof Status of Execution: The Austrian administrative court system has EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1109
VISY v. Slovakia
VISY v. Slovakia SVK 18/03/2019 00:00:00 05/04/2019 11:14:01 Case Description: The case concerns the re seizure by the Slovakian authorities in 2012 of items belonging to an Austrian businessman at the request of the Austrian authorities. The Court deemed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51885
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERGLAS GMBH v. Austria AUT 27/01/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the applicant company EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-967
WIRTSCHAFTS-TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN-VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria
WIRTSCHAFTS TREND ZEITSCHRIFTEN VERLAGSGESELLSCHAFT M.B.H. v. Austria AUT 13/03/2006 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to conviction for defamation for publishing an article in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-979