Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 37
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
AYETULLAH AY v. Turkey
AYETULLAH AY v. Turkey TUR 08/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: The case concerns unfair criminal proceedings relating to terrorism. The shortcomings found include inter alia: Lack of assistance and presence of a lawyer at the time of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57071
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BORISOVA v. Bulgaria
BORISOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 21/03/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:50:56 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial in the context of proceedings under the Decree on Combating Minor Hooliganism as a result of which EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14709
CETINKAYA v. Turkey
CETINKAYA v. Turkey TUR 27/09/2006 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the applicant s director of a human rights association right to freedom of association on account of his conviction under former Article 37 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37419
DE LESQUEN DU PLESSIS-CASSO v. France
DE LESQUEN DU PLESSIS CASSO v. France FRA 12/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s criminal conviction for public defamation of a deputy mayor during a municipal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33303
DORNEANU v. Romania
DORNEANU v. Romania ROU 28/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman treatment suffered by the applicant an inmate afflicted with terminal prostate cancer. The European Court ruled that his continued detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49135
DRAGAN PETROVIC v. Serbia
DRAGAN PETROVIC v. Serbia SRB 14/08/2020 00:00:00 02/09/2020 11:20:49 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to private life on account of taking from him a DNA saliva sample in the context of a criminal investigation in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55793
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GUKOVYCH v. Ukraine
GUKOVYCH v. Ukraine UKR 20/01/2017 00:00:00 22/03/2017 14:48:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unnecessary detention in a sobering up centre without clear accessible and foreseeable legal basis. Article 5 1e Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46261
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern principally large scale violence against prisoners with the involvement of special forces rapid reaction units and prison staff either as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32113
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31300
L. v. Lithuania
L. v. Lithuania LTU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private life on account of the absence of implementing legislation to regulate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4320
LYASHKO v. Ukraine
LYASHKO v. Ukraine UKR 10/11/2006 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s conviction for publishing four articles criticising certain state officials. Article 10 Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26174