Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 53
A.B.V. v. Russia
A.B.V. v. Russia RUS 02/01/2019 00:00:00 24/01/2019 10:13:38 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former partners and one EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51193
AMANALACHIOAI v. Romania
AMANALACHIOAI v. Romania ROU 26/08/2009 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Lack of protection of family life: Impossibility for the applicant to obtain the return of his daughter who remained at her maternal grandparents after school holidays EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17534
BAJRAMI v. Albania
BAJRAMI v. Albania ALB 12/03/2007 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to take necessary measures to reunite a divorced father with his child abducted abroad and lack of an effective remedy for preventing or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-237
BEELER v. Switzerland
BEELER v. Switzerland CHE 11/10/2022 00:00:00 18/10/2022 14:54:25 Case Description: This case concerns discrimination based on sex on account of the termination of the applicant s widower s pension when his younger daughter had reached the age of majority EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61449
BITTOUN v. the Republic of Moldova
BITTOUN v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 05/03/2019 00:00:00 08/03/2019 16:14:41 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of authorities to ensure the applicant s access to this daughter in the light of the child s mother s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51675
BLYUDIK v. Russia
BLYUDIK v. Russia RUS 25/09/2019 00:00:00 17/10/2019 17:25:55 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s minor daughter s right to liberty Article 5 1 d and to enforceable compensation for it Article 5 5 as well as violation of the applicant s and his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52991
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova
BORDEIANU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 11/04/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the violation of the applicants rights to respect for their family life on account of the failure by the authorities to execute EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7144
BRUNNER v. Poland
BRUNNER v. Poland POL 09/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: Repetitive case. Relevant leading cases with detailed information on status of execution including examinations by the Committee of Ministers are presented in the leading EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55581
BUSCEMI v. Italy
BUSCEMI v. Italy ITA 16/09/1999 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:43:17 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair custody proceedings concerning the applicant s daughter due to the Youth Court President s public statements justifying EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-45104
CAPIN v. Turkey
CAPIN v. Turkey TUR 15/01/2020 00:00:00 30/01/2020 15:08:36 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Dismissal of a daughter s request for paternity establishment as out of the statutory limitation period without allowing her to plead the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54621
CINTA v. Romania
CINTA v. Romania ROU 18/06/2020 00:00:00 29/06/2020 11:35:05 Case Description: The present case concerns the restrictions placed by the domestic courts in 2018 on the contact rights of the applicant who suffers from mental illness in respect of his four EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55473
FANIEL v. Belgium
FANIEL v. Belgium BEL 01/06/2011 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the applicant s lack of information on relevant formalities and time limits to lodge an appeal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1537
FURMAN v. Slovenia and Austria
FURMAN v. Slovenia and Austria SVN 05/05/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:51:27 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference as a result of the excessive length of proceedings concerning custody and visiting rights EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22990
GOLDNAGL v. Austria
GOLDNAGL v. Austria AUT 07/09/2017 00:00:00 20/09/2017 18:11:03 Case Description: Protection of family life: Lack effective protection of the right to family life in the context of return proceedings under the Brussels IIa Regulation following the removal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47679
GUBASHEVA AND FERZAULI v. Russia
GUBASHEVA AND FERZAULI v. Russia RUS 05/08/2020 00:00:00 21/08/2020 16:51:54 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55759
H.K. v. Finland
H.K. v. Finland FIN 26/12/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure of authorities to take formal decisions when placing a child in emergency care and inability of the applicant to contest access restrictions. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4770
HADDAD v. Spain
HADDAD v. Spain ESP 18/09/2019 00:00:00 30/09/2019 10:16:14 Case Description: The Haddad case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to respect for family life as a result of the decisions taken by the administrative and judicial authorities to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52853
HROMADKA AND HROMADKOVA v. Russia
HROMADKA AND HROMADKOVA v. Russia RUS 11/03/2015 00:00:00 07/11/2016 16:34:16 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of international child abductions and problems related to application of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26420
LEÓN MADRID v. Spain
LE N MADRID v. Spain ESP 26/01/2022 00:00:00 11/02/2022 10:40:32 Case Description: On 9 November 2005 the applicant gave birth to a daughter who was registered under the mother s two surnames paternal and maternal . In a judgment of 14 February 2007 the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59635
LEYLA CAN v. Turkey
LEYLA CAN v. Turkey TUR 04/11/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unjustified interference on account of the refusal of the applicant s request as a single adoptive mother to have her own forename EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54153