Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 26
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
BULGARIAN ORTHODOX OLD CALENDAR CHURCH AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
BULGARIAN ORTHODOX OLD CALENDAR CHURCH AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 20/04/2021 00:00:00 23/04/2021 09:38:23 Case Description: These cases concern unjustified judicial refusals in 2013 and 2014 to register two Orthodox churches on the ground that they had EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57381
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
G.U. v. Turkey
G.U. v. Turkey TUR 18/01/2017 00:00:00 04/04/2017 11:44:07 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment and a violation of the right to respect for private and family life on account of lack of an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46531
GURBAN v. Turkey
GURBAN v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:35:29 Case Description: This group of cases concern violations of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on account of the applicants sentences to aggravated life EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36750
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey
ISIKIRIK v. Turkey TUR 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/05/2018 15:49:31 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having expressed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49517
L. v. Lithuania
L. v. Lithuania LTU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private life on account of the absence of implementing legislation to regulate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4320
M v. Ukraine
M v. Ukraine UKR 19/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern a lack of proper and fair procedure for authorisation of admission and subsequent retention in the course of civil involuntary hospitalisation between 2000 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31581
MAKARATZIS v. Greece
MAKARATZIS v. Greece GRC 20/12/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Use of potentially lethal force by the police in the absence of an adequate legislative and administrative framework EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15563
MARIUSZ LEWANDOWSKI v. Poland
MARIUSZ LEWANDOWSKI v. Poland POL 03/10/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Violation of Article 6 1 of the Convention and the right to an impartial tribunal as the same judge in 2009 who applied a disciplinary penalty as consequence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20620
MERABISHVILI v. Georgia
MERABISHVILI v. Georgia GEO 28/11/2017 00:00:00 13/12/2017 10:54:38 Case Description: The case concerns violations suffered by the applicant a former Prime Minister and Minister of the Interior of Georgia during his pre trial detention in the context of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48437
N.K.M. v. Hungary
N.K.M. v. Hungary HUN 04/11/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to high taxation 98 of the upper bracket of the severance pay the applicants were entitled to after termination of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10953
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey
OYA ATAMAN v. Turkey TUR 05/03/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: This group concerns violations of the right to freedom of peaceful assembly including the prosecution of participants and/or the use of excessive force to disperse peaceful EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37415
PANORAMA LTD v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
PANORAMA LTD v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 25/10/2017 00:00:00 12/12/2017 10:40:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Non enforcement of final domestic decisions ordering payment of war damages in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48353
PATUREL v. France
PATUREL v. France FRA 22/03/2006 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Dispropotionate interference due to criminal or civil convictions or findings in proceedings for defamation for condoning or complicity in condoning war EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33189
STEININGER v. Austria
STEININGER v. Austria AUT 17/07/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:17:47 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court due to the limited power of review of the Administrative Court as regards the applicant companies EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-537