Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 47
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
APARICIO NAVARRO REVERTER AND GARCIA SAN MIGUEL Y ORUETA v. Spain
APARICIO NAVARRO REVERTER AND GARCIA SAN MIGUEL Y ORUETA v. Spain ESP 10/04/2017 00:00:00 02/06/2017 09:05:24 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of a fair hearing before administrative courts due to the failure to notify the applicant owners EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46905
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia ARM 30/03/2017 00:00:00 30/01/2018 15:07:59 Case Description: This group of four cases concerns the non enforcement or delayed enforcement of final domestic judgments adopted in favour of the applicants notably concerning property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46455
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary
BARCZA AND OTHERS v. Hungary HUN 11/01/2017 00:00:00 26/04/2017 16:15:53 Case Description: This group concerns lengthy expropriation proceedings hindering the use of the property in question. Barcza: Violation of the right to protection of property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46703
BASMENKOVA v. Bulgaria
BASMENKOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 06/04/2017 00:00:00 06/04/2017 16:13:56 Case Description: This group of cases concerns failure to provide the applicants with compensation for expropriations which took place during the 1980s or the early 1990s. The applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46613
BRAHIMAJ v. Albania
BRAHIMAJ v. Albania ALB 06/10/2016 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice protection of property and lack of an effective remedy: Domestic authorities failure to execute final judicial decisions EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-277
CROCE AND OTHERS v. Italy
CROCE AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 16/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: This case concerns the expropriation of a private land for the construction of a public road and failure of the national authorities to guarantee the payment of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59101
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 10/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The cases concern the interference with the applicants right to respect for their home and private and family life Article 8 . In the Dubetska and others case the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31571
FEDOTOV v. Russia
FEDOTOV v. Russia RUS 25/01/2006 00:00:00 20/02/2018 08:33:34 Case Description: This group of cases concerns poor material conditions of detention in temporary police holding facilities for criminal suspects IVS under the authority of the Ministry of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14084
FRASCINO v. Italy
FRASCINO v. Italy ITA 11/03/2004 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference on account of the failure of to comply with a final and enforceable judgment of the Council of State which ordered the granting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-42861
GEREKSAR v. Turkey
GEREKSAR v. Turkey TUR 01/05/2011 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Expropriation on account of the construction of an airport on the applicants properties and failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37246
GOMI v. Turkey
GOMI v. Turkey TUR 24/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: This case concerns failure of the authorities to place the applicant who had been sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment and suffering from a psychotic illness since 2003 in a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52507
GRIGOLOVIC v. Lithuania
GRIGOLOVIC v. Lithuania LTU 10/01/2018 00:00:00 07/02/2018 16:20:53 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to act with sufficient promptness to restore the applicants property rights to previously nationalised lands Grigolovic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48761
JAMES v. the United Kingdom
JAMES v. the United Kingdom GBR 11/02/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Arbitrary and unlawful detention of prisoners with indeterminate sentences for public protection IPP : after expiry of tariff periods failure to provide appropriate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3011
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria BGR 18/04/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Most of these cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicants in penitentiary facilities between 1996 and 2019 in particular owing to overcrowding poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3589
KISLAKCI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
KISLAKCI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 27/02/2018 00:00:00 06/03/2018 14:12:52 Case Description: Protection of property rights / functioning of justice: Disproportionate interference on account of the administrative courts failure in the context of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48997
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia
KOLYADENKO AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns the failure by the State to discharge its positive obligation to protect lives in the context of a large scale flood in the area around the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14122
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213