Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 88
A.T. v. Austria
A.T. v. Austria AUT 21/06/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of a public oral hearing in compensation proceedings for defamation under the Media Act. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-847
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine
ABRAMOVA v. Ukraine UKR 18/12/2018 00:00:00 07/01/2019 11:55:18 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the courts failure to examine the applicant s defamation claim against the prosecutor s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51049
AEPI S.A. v. Greece
AEPI S.A. v. Greece GRC 11/07/2002 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of excess to a court due to dismissals of appeals on points of law by the Court of Cassation as being out of time EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22216
AGEYEVY v. Russia
AGEYEVY v. Russia RUS 09/09/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: 5 violations of the right to respect for private and family life Article 8 of the applicants a married couple in the context of events which resulted in the removal of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14030
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ANTICA AND SC R SA v. Romania
ANTICA AND SC R SA v. Romania ROU 02/06/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Unfair civil proceedings for defamation and disproportionate interference with freedom of expression: Lack of reasoning of the court decisions holding both EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16579
ARLEWIN v. Sweden
ARLEWIN v. Sweden SWE 01/06/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:39:23 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the obligation under Article 6 of the Convention to provide the applicant with effective access to court to obtain protection against alleged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2062
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
ATANASOVIC AND OTHERS v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 12/04/2006 00:00:00 28/10/2016 09:59:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and effective remedy: Excessive length of civil labour criminal and enforcement EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5038
AVRAM AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova
AVRAM AND OTHERS v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 05/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of private life: Supreme Court s failure to award to the applicants as victims of defamation a proportionate compensation for the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6852
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BODROZIC v. Serbia
BODROZIC v. Serbia SRB 10/12/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 15:36:53 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to criminal sanctions for defamation imposed on journalists. Article 10 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8751
BOZHKOV v. Bulgaria
BOZHKOV v. Bulgaria BGR 19/07/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 15:12:04 Case Description: Disproportionate interference with the freedom of expression of the applicants journalists as a result of their convictions to administrative penalty in criminal proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1909
CHEMODUROV v. Russia
CHEMODUROV v. Russia RUS 31/10/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violations of the right to freedom of expression of the applicants mainly journalists in civil defamation and criminal proceedings due notably to the lack of distinction EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13597
DALBAN v. Romania
DALBAN v. Romania ROU 28/09/1999 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Freedom of expression protection of private and family life and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Criminal convictions of journalists for insult and/or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15961
DE LESQUEN DU PLESSIS-CASSO v. France
DE LESQUEN DU PLESSIS CASSO v. France FRA 12/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s criminal conviction for public defamation of a deputy mayor during a municipal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33303
EDITORIAL BOARD OF PRAVOYE DELO AND SHTEKEL v. Ukraine
EDITORIAL BOARD OF PRAVOYE DELO AND SHTEKEL v. Ukraine UKR 05/08/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unlawful interference due to the court ordering a newspaper s editorial board and its editor in chief to apologise EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31614
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland
EERIKAINEN AND OTHERS v. Finland FIN 13/03/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:19:54 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the applicants right to freedom of expression due to criminal or civil convictions between 2000 and 2011 for invading the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5968