Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 62
A. A. v. Switzerland
A. A. v. Switzerland CHE 07/04/2014 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:13:37 Case Description: Risk of ill treatment in case of deportation to Sudan: assessment of genuineness of the applicant s post flight political activities and the resulting risk. Status of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5922
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark DNK 15/12/2020 00:00:00 09/02/2021 09:54:42 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman or degrading treatment in 2013 of a man suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was strapped to a restraint bed in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56537
ALEKSANDR ALEKSANDROV v. Russia
ALEKSANDR ALEKSANDROV v. Russia RUS 10/09/2018 00:00:00 24/09/2018 15:23:04 Case Description: This case concerns the discriminatory treatment of the applicant in that the domestic courts which convicted him in 2005 denied him a non custodial sentence on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50261
ALIYEV v. Ukraine
ALIYEV v. Ukraine UKR 10/06/2021 00:00:00 11/06/2021 17:47:07 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unjustified interference due to the revocation in 2010 of the applicant s residence permit and the issuance of an expulsion order with a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57741
ANDERSSON AND OTHERS v. Sweden
ANDERSSON AND OTHERS v. Sweden SWE 25/12/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inability to obtain a full judicial review of the authorities decisions permitting the construction of a railway EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2190
BADER AND KANBOR v. Sweden
BADER AND KANBOR v. Sweden SWE 08/02/2006 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Right to life and protection against ill treatment: Dismissal of the asylum application of a Syrian husband his wife and their children and adoption of a decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2160
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy ITA 26/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55019
BAYATYAN v. Armenia
BAYATYAN v. Armenia ARM 07/07/2011 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Conviction to prison of conscientious objectors Status of Execution: The applicants were released on parole and their criminal records erased in 2006 i.e. even before the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-391
BEKIR-OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece
BEKIR OUSTA AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 11/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to freedom of association Article 11 due to the domestic courts rulings not to register associations Bekir Ousta and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15567
BRAGI GUÐMUNDUR KRISTJÁNSSON v. Iceland
BRAGI GU MUNDUR KRISTJ NSSON v. Iceland ISL 30/11/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: These cases concern the violations of Article 4 of Protocol 7 right not to be tried or punished twice ne bis in idem on the account of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59201
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania
BUCUR AND TOMA v. Romania ROU 08/04/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This case concerns the disclosure by the first applicant a military official in the Romanian Intelligence Service SRI of information on wide scale illegal telephone EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12840
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy ITA 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55275
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy
DI SARNO AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 10/04/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This case concerns the interference with the applicants right to respect for their private lives and their homes because of the Italian authorities prolonged EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28262
GOMI v. Turkey
GOMI v. Turkey TUR 24/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: This case concerns failure of the authorities to place the applicant who had been sentenced to aggravated life imprisonment and suffering from a psychotic illness since 2003 in a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52507
GORGULU v. Germany
GORGULU v. Germany DEU 26/05/2004 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life: Refusal to give custody to the father of a child born out of wedlock and living with a foster family without considering the long term effects on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38410
GORLOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
GORLOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/11/2019 00:00:00 18/11/2019 16:25:04 Case Description: Violation of the applicants right to private life on account of permanent CCTV camera surveillance of their cells on the basis of the legal framework incompatible EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54141
GRACE GATT v. Malta
GRACE GATT v. Malta MLT 08/01/2020 00:00:00 24/01/2020 11:03:23 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of independence and impartiality of the bodies which decided on the applicant s dismissal from police force in 2015 violation of Article 6 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54591
GRIEVES v. the United Kingdom
GRIEVES v. the United Kingdom GBR 16/12/2003 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of Navy court martial criminal proceedings resulting in convictions due to the courts lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2232
GROSARU v. Romania
GROSARU v. Romania ROU 02/06/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Just satisfaction paid. The impugned law was repealed and replaced by Law no. 208/2015. In the current system there are two autonomous bodies competent in the electoral EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13081