Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 61 - 80 of 160
ISAYEV v. Ukraine
ISAYEV v. Ukraine UKR 28/08/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in particular EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31324
J.D. AND A v. the United Kingdom
J.D. AND A v. the United Kingdom GBR 24/02/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:03 Case Description: Discrimination / protection of property rights: Unjustified and disproportionate discriminatory effect of housing benefit regulations in the social housing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54951
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KATS AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 18/03/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The Logvinenko and Isayev groups of cases concern the inadequacy of medical care in general and for infectious diseases drug addiction and physical disability in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31596
KAVERZIN v. Ukraine
KAVERZIN v. Ukraine UKR 15/08/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31569
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria
KEHAYOV v. Bulgaria BGR 18/04/2005 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Most of these cases concern the inhuman and degrading treatment of the applicants in penitentiary facilities between 1996 and 2019 in particular owing to overcrowding poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3589
KHAN v. France
KHAN v. France FRA 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment of the applicant a 12 year old unaccompanied minor UM in transit to the United Kingdom resulting from the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52223
KHASHIYEV AND AKAYEVA v. Russia
KHASHIYEV AND AKAYEVA v. Russia RUS 06/07/2005 00:00:00 07/10/2016 11:21:54 Case Description: These cases mainly concern violations relating to the actions of Russian security forces during anti terrorist operations in the Northern Caucasus mostly in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9
KLAUZ v. Croatia
KLAUZ v. Croatia HRV 09/12/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Denial of access to court and disproportionate interference with property rights due to the ordering EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10125
KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. Russia
KONSTANTIN MARKIN v. Russia RUS 22/03/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the discrimination of the applicants military serviceman and police officers on account of different conditions for parental leave based on their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13956
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
KOWALSKI v. Poland
KOWALSKI v. Poland POL 11/06/2013 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:20:29 Case Description: Unfair criminal proceedings: Refusal by the court of appeal in 2008 to appoint a legal aid lawyer with a view to assist in the preparation of the cassation appeal based on an EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39893
KREUZ v. Poland
KREUZ v. Poland POL 19/06/2001 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to courts of different levels due to domestic courts refusal to grant exoneration from court fees. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17779
KUDESHKINA v. Russia
KUDESHKINA v. Russia RUS 14/09/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to disciplinary proceedings leading to her dismissal in 2004 from judicial office for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13926
KUNIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
KUNIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 14/02/2018 00:00:00 06/03/2018 14:12:52 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of non enforcement of domestic judgments ordering four EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49047
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 26/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:00:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and discrimination: Automatic deprivation without prior notification of the applicants status as permanent residents in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12107
KVARTUC v. Croatia
KVARTUC v. Croatia HRV 18/02/2005 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of enforcement proceedings and in one case lack of an effective remedy. Article 6 1 and 13 Other violations: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10077
KVASNICA v. Slovakia
KVASNICA v. Slovakia SVK 09/09/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Unlawful and unnecessary interference due to interception of the applicant s professional telephone communications in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8021
KWIECIEN v. Poland
KWIECIEN v. Poland POL 09/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to regional court s order in defamation proceedings under the Law on Local Elections to publish in a local newspaper EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18033
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213