Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 43
ALIM v. Russia
ALIM v. Russia RUS 27/12/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the right to respect for the applicants family life a Cameroonian national Alim and an Azerbaijani national Guliyev and Sheina in the event of their administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14140
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BOLAT v. Russia
BOLAT v. Russia RUS 05/01/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case concerns two violations of the Convention relating to unlawful actions by executive authorities: The first violation relates to the freedom of movement of the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13741
BOYKO v. Russia
BOYKO v. Russia RUS 20/02/2018 00:00:00 09/03/2018 16:28:42 Case Description: Violation of the right to freedom of religion because during the applicant s detention on remand in Moscow in 2007 and 2008 the investigator refused him to see priests Article 9 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49083
CESTARO v. Italy
CESTARO v. Italy ITA 07/07/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of four judgments and two decisions friendly settlements with undertakings concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants at the hands of State agents and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28298
DE TOMMASO v. Italy
DE TOMMASO v. Italy ITA 23/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: This case concerns the quality of the Italian legislation on imposition of special police supervision orders involving restrictions of various freedoms on persons considered EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46307
DZHAKSYBERGENOV (AKA JAXYBERGENOV) v. Ukraine
DZHAKSYBERGENOV AKA JAXYBERGENOV v. Ukraine UKR 20/06/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Freedom of movement: Unlawful ban to leave the territory in the context of extradition proceedings with regard to the first applicant / EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31267
FEILAZOO v. Malta
FEILAZOO v. Malta MLT 11/06/2021 00:00:00 24/06/2021 17:58:49 Case Description: This case concerns the inadequate conditions of the applicant s detention pending deportation in the periods from 16 to 23 May 2019 and from 15 September 2019 to 13 November EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57955
G.S. v. Bulgaria
G.S. v. Bulgaria BGR 19/04/2019 00:00:00 04/07/2019 17:16:59 Case Description: This case concerns a potential breach of the prohibition of torture owing to the possible corporal punishment that awaits the applicant in Iran potential violation of Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52425
G.T. v. Greece
G.T. v. Greece GRC 13/03/2023 00:00:00 27/03/2023 08:53:55 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the applicant s right to respect for his private and family life on account of the public prosecutor s rejection in 2016 of the former s urgent EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-62919
GOSAV AND OTHERS v. Romania
GOSAV AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate interference with the right to a family life of the applicants who serve prison sentences and were denied in 2017 the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55303
HAJIBEYLI v. Azerbaijan
HAJIBEYLI v. Azerbaijan AZE 10/10/2008 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: This group of three cases concerns violations of the applicants right to freedom of movement violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 . In the cases of Hajibeyli and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1868
IVANOV v. Ukraine
IVANOV v. Ukraine UKR 07/03/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: The cases of the present group concern the unjustified restriction to the right to liberty of movement in connection with the undertaking not to abscond given by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31094
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KHAN v. France
KHAN v. France FRA 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment of the applicant a 12 year old unaccompanied minor UM in transit to the United Kingdom resulting from the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52223
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KOVALEV v. Russia
KOVALEV v. Russia RUS 12/11/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the principles of adversarial proceedings and equality of arms in civil proceedings initiated by or against the applicants in detention on account of the domestic EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13621
KUDESHKINA v. Russia
KUDESHKINA v. Russia RUS 14/09/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to disciplinary proceedings leading to her dismissal in 2004 from judicial office for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13926
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213