Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 53
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark DNK 15/12/2020 00:00:00 09/02/2021 09:54:42 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman or degrading treatment in 2013 of a man suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was strapped to a restraint bed in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56537
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression on account of domestic court orders blocking access to Google Sites and YouTube EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37256
ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
ASSENOV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 28/10/1998 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention protection against detention lack of a remedy: Lack of judicial review of the decision to detain the applicant on remand and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14265
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BATALINY v. Russia
BATALINY v. Russia RUS 14/12/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the first applicant on account of his forced psychiatric treatment in the absence of an established medical need EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13974
BEGHAL v. the United Kingdom
BEGHAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: Protection of private life: Arbitrary interference due to the use of counter terrorism legislation by border control officers Schedule 7 Powers to stop and question EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52217
BERDZENISHVILI AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERDZENISHVILI AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 20/03/2017 00:00:00 06/04/2017 15:55:09 Case Description: These cases concern the arbitrary arrest detention and collective expulsion from the Russian Federation of Georgian nationals in autumn 2006. In EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46587
CONKA v. Belgium
CONKA v. Belgium BEL 05/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / expulsion / prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens: Arrest of Slovakian nationals and asylum seekers of Roma origin with a view to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1477
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
GARABAYEV v. Russia
GARABAYEV v. Russia RUS 30/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns different violations related to extradition violations of Articles 3 5 13 and 34 . The violations of Article 5 1 relate to the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14088
GAVRIL YOSIFOV v. Bulgaria
GAVRIL YOSIFOV v. Bulgaria BGR 06/02/2009 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Impossibility to obtain timely judicial determination of the issue whether a prison sentence had become final and enforceable as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3815
GEBREMEDHIN [GABERAMADHIEN] v. France
GEBREMEDHIN GABERAMADHIEN v. France FRA 26/07/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of an effective remedy with automatic suspensive effect as requested by the Convention to defend the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33047
GHIURAU v. Romania
GHIURAU v. Romania ROU 29/04/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: just EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13121
I.S. AND OTHERS v. Malta
I.S. AND OTHERS v. Malta MLT 18/03/2021 00:00:00 30/03/2021 16:37:50 Case Description: This case concerns mainly the failure of the authorities despite numerous expert reports and recommendations as well as the Family Court s orders issued at the initial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57055
INSANOV v. Azerbaijan
INSANOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/06/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 11:35:31 Case Description: These two cases concern inhuman and degrading conditions of detention violations of Article 3 . In the Insanov case the applicant a former Minister of Health Care was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1801
IPEK AND OTHERS v. Turkey
IPEK AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/05/2009 00:00:00 09/11/2016 12:41:41 Case Description: Right to liberty and security: Unlawful arrest and detention of minors on suspicion of being members of an illegal terrorist organisation without sufficient evidence EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-34270
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania
IUSTIN ROBERTINO MICU v. Romania ROU 13/04/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:28:55 Case Description: This case concerns the applicant s ill treatment on account of failure by the authorities to provide the applicant with food for about 10 hours in March 2010 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17609
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363