Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 101
A.P. v. Slovakia
A.P. v. Slovakia SVK 28/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: The case concerns police violence committed against a Romani boy in 2015 and failure to investigate the incident in 2015 2016 substantial and procedural violations of Article 3 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55365
A. v. Croatia
A. v. Croatia HRV 14/01/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of authorities to provide adequate protection against domestic violence due to various shortcomings e.g. individual programme during prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10339
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey
AHMET YILDIRIM v. Turkey TUR 18/03/2013 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: These cases concern a violation of the applicants right to freedom of expression on account of domestic court orders blocking access to Google Sites and YouTube EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37256
ASDAC v. the Republic of Moldova
ASDAC v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 08/03/2021 00:00:00 24/03/2021 16:28:16 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the National Bank of Moldova s use on new coins of artworks created by two members of the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57043
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BAYATYAN v. Armenia
BAYATYAN v. Armenia ARM 07/07/2011 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:33:58 Case Description: Conviction to prison of conscientious objectors Status of Execution: The applicants were released on parole and their criminal records erased in 2006 i.e. even before the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-391
BELOUSOV v. Ukraine
BELOUSOV v. Ukraine UKR 07/02/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Details of this case together with status of execution can be found under the case of KAVERZIN http://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng i 004 31569 Status of Execution: Details of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32054
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia
BERKOVICH AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 27/06/2018 00:00:00 27/07/2018 11:01:47 Case Description: This case concerns the restrictions imposed in 2005 2013 on the right to travel abroad on account of the authorities refusal to issue travel passports after EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49913
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 15/04/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Failure to protect the lives of the applicants relatives from a person who had been previously convicted of threatening to kill them Branko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10317
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania ROU 19/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13455
D.H. AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
D.H. AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 13/11/2007 00:00:00 12/06/2018 11:57:23 Case Description: The case concerns discrimination in the enjoyment by the applicants of their right to education due to their much higher likelihood because of their Roma 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31
EUROMAK METAL DOO v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
EUROMAK METAL DOO v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 08/10/2018 00:00:00 30/10/2018 16:53:51 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the deprivation of the applicant company of the right to deduct value EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50655
GAKHARIA v. Georgia
GAKHARIA v. Georgia GEO 17/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:45:10 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to the infringement of the principle of equality of arms and adversarial proceedings in the first case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46769
GARABAYEV v. Russia
GARABAYEV v. Russia RUS 30/01/2008 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The present group of cases concerns different violations related to extradition violations of Articles 3 5 13 and 34 . The violations of Article 5 1 relate to the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14088
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GOSPODARIA TARANEASCA 'ALCAZ G.A.' v. the Republic of Moldova
GOSPODARIA TARANEASCA ALCAZ G.A. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 01/03/2022 00:00:00 03/03/2022 15:55:23 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the deprivation of the applicant company s right to deduct the VAT it EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59821