Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 83
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia
ALEKSEYEV v. Russia RUS 11/04/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The group of cases Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicants right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans on the holding of gay EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14136
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
BAKA v. Hungary
BAKA v. Hungary HUN 23/06/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: The European Court found violations of the Convention on account of the undue and premature termination of the applicants mandates as President Baka case and Vice President Erm EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10859
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BATALINY v. Russia
BATALINY v. Russia RUS 14/12/2015 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman and degrading treatment of the first applicant on account of his forced psychiatric treatment in the absence of an established medical need EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13974
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
BAYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 13/11/2017 00:00:00 28/11/2017 10:01:20 Case Description: The case of Alekseyev concerns the disproportionate interference with the applicant s right to freedom of assembly due to the repeated bans over a period of three EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48317
BLOKHIN v. Russia
BLOKHIN v. Russia RUS 23/03/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns three violations of the Convention which occurred when the applicant aged twelve at the material time was placed in a temporary detention centre for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13966
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland
BRODA AND BOJARA v. Poland POL 29/09/2021 00:00:00 22/10/2021 14:42:32 Case Description: The Reczkowicz group concerns infringements of the right to a tribunal established by law due to the fact that the judges of the various chambers in the Supreme Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58717
C.N. v. the United Kingdom
C.N. v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/02/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Domestic servitude and ineffective investigations of related complaints: inadequate legislative provisions to afford practical and effective protection against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3021
CESTARO v. Italy
CESTARO v. Italy ITA 07/07/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of four judgments and two decisions friendly settlements with undertakings concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants at the hands of State agents and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28298
COSTA AND PAVAN v. Italy
COSTA AND PAVAN v. Italy ITA 11/02/2013 00:00:00 28/11/2016 11:00:12 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to inconsistency in the legal system in the field of medically assisted procreation preventing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44963
CSOMA v. Romania
CSOMA v. Romania ROU 15/04/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Protection of private life: Medical procedure necessary due to pregnancy complications leading to permanent inability to bear children carried out without the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17564
DACTYLIDI v. Greece
DACTYLIDI v. Greece GRC 09/07/2003 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Effective remedy and protection of property access to and efficient functioning of justice: Lack of an effective remedy to compel authorities to enforce administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15579
DENIZCI AND OTHERS v. Cyprus
DENIZCI AND OTHERS v. Cyprus CYP 23/08/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / protection of rights in detention / expulsion: Ill treatment by police officers upon arrest and provisional detention in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1962
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
DUBETSKA AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 10/05/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The cases concern the interference with the applicants right to respect for their home and private and family life Article 8 . In the Dubetska and others case the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31571
EGMEZ v. Cyprus
EGMEZ v. Cyprus CYP 21/12/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 17:40:39 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / protection of rights in detention / expulsion: Ill treatment by police officers upon arrest and provisional detention in the second case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1968
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
EUROMAK METAL DOO v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
EUROMAK METAL DOO v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 08/10/2018 00:00:00 30/10/2018 16:53:51 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the deprivation of the applicant company of the right to deduct value EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50655
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354