Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 43
A.A. v. the United Kingdom
A.A. v. the United Kingdom GBR 20/12/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference based on a deportation order against a foreigner who had committed a serious offence as a minor without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2919
ABBATIELLO v. Italy
ABBATIELLO v. Italy ITA 20/12/2007 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:46:44 Case Description: Protection of private life: Limitations of personal capacity in bankruptcy proceedings after the closure of bankruptcy proceedings and impossibility of obtaining EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44521
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BJEDOV v. Croatia
BJEDOV v. Croatia HRV 29/08/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 15:28:29 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Disproportionate interference on account of the domestic courts decisions ordering the applicants to leave State owned flats failing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12035
CAZACU v. the Republic of Moldova
CAZACU v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 23/01/2008 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful refusal by domestic courts to grant the applicant redundancy payments as stipulated by domestic law. Article 1 of Protocol No. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7182
CESTARO v. Italy
CESTARO v. Italy ITA 07/07/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of four judgments and two decisions friendly settlements with undertakings concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants at the hands of State agents and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28298
CHAHAL v. the United Kingdom
CHAHAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 15/11/1996 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment protection of rights in detention effective remedy: Risk of ill treatment in case of the applicant s deportation to India lack of a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2388
CONKA v. Belgium
CONKA v. Belgium BEL 05/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / expulsion / prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens: Arrest of Slovakian nationals and asylum seekers of Roma origin with a view to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1477
CSASZY v. Hungary
CSASZY v. Hungary HUN 21/01/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the refusal of leave from prison to attend the funeral of or pay a visit to a close relative. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10995
DICKSON v. the United Kingdom
DICKSON v. the United Kingdom GBR 04/12/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the Home Secretary s refusal to grant a prisoner serving a life sentence and his wife their request EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2810
ECIS v. Latvia
ECIS v. Latvia LVA 24/06/2019 00:00:00 17/07/2019 15:36:28 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private and family life: Discriminatory treatment of a male convict on sexual grounds in comparison with female prisoners on account of his being EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52499
FRASIK v. Poland
FRASIK v. Poland POL 05/04/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: Right to marry lack of an effective remedy and protection of rights in detention: Disproportionate interference due to lack of restraint displayed by the national judge in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20590
GIOSAKIS v. Greece (n° 1)
GIOSAKIS v. Greece n 1 GRC 12/05/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 16:42:14 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Refusal of the applicants request for leave to appear in person before the Indictment Division and the investigating judge whilst the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-15595
GISZCZAK v. Poland
GISZCZAK v. Poland POL 29/02/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Domestic court s refusal of the applicant s requests for compassionate leave to visit his dying daughter in hospital and the failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-19275
HUTTEN-CZAPSKA v. Poland
HUTTEN CZAPSKA v. Poland POL 19/06/2006 00:00:00 21/11/2016 10:14:57 Case Description: Protection of property: Systemic problem the malfunctioning of national legislation on housing in that: it imposed restrictions on landlords rights and did not provide EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39852
JUSIC v. Switzerland
JUSIC v. Switzerland CHE 02/03/2011 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / expulsion: Unlawful detention of a rejected asylum seeker with a view to his deportation due to the national authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4748
K.O. AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
K.O. AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/02/2022 00:00:00 25/02/2022 11:14:30 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Alleged interference due to a deportation order made against the applicants father following his conviction for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59757
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KHAN v. France
KHAN v. France FRA 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment of the applicant a 12 year old unaccompanied minor UM in transit to the United Kingdom resulting from the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52223