Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 34
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
AVILKINA AND OTHERS v. Russia
AVILKINA AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 07/10/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Violation of the right to private life of the second and fourth applicants neither suspect nor accused in any investigation on account of the disclosure of their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14016
AYCAGUER v. France
AYCAGUER v. France FRA 22/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference with regard to the applicant s refusal in the context of a criminal sanction to comply with the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47815
BEGHAL v. the United Kingdom
BEGHAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: Protection of private life: Arbitrary interference due to the use of counter terrorism legislation by border control officers Schedule 7 Powers to stop and question EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52217
BRUNET v. France
BRUNET v. France FRA 18/12/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:16:33 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the lack of a real possibility for seeking deletion of information recorded in a crime database despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30069
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/07/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Arbitrary interference due to monitoring of the applicant s telephone e mail and internet usage during the course of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2682
D.S. v. the United Kingdom
D.S. v. the United Kingdom GBR 30/06/2021 00:00:00 15/07/2021 10:21:13 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unlawful interference due to the past disclosure of the applicant s criminal record pursuant to a regime in force until May EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58145
DORNEANU v. Romania
DORNEANU v. Romania ROU 28/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman treatment suffered by the applicant an inmate afflicted with terminal prostate cancer. The European Court ruled that his continued detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49135
DRAGAN PETROVIC v. Serbia
DRAGAN PETROVIC v. Serbia SRB 14/08/2020 00:00:00 02/09/2020 11:20:49 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to private life on account of taking from him a DNA saliva sample in the context of a criminal investigation in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55793
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
HALABI v. France
HALABI v. France FRA 16/08/2019 00:00:00 26/08/2019 11:34:26 Case Description: Protection of private and family life / respect for home: Disproportionate interference of the applicant s right to respect for his home due to an urban planning inspection EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52661
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KEBE AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/04/2017 00:00:00 03/05/2017 11:29:10 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various deficiencies in the procedures related to different aspects of the treatment of asylum seekers in Ukraine at different times in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46729
KLEYN AND ALEKSANDROVICH v. Russia
KLEYN AND ALEKSANDROVICH v. Russia RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:09:02 Case Description: The case concerns the violation of the right to life on account of a failure to effectively investigate the death of the applicants wife and mother a woman of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26114
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine
KUZNETSOV v. Ukraine UKR 29/04/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concern ill treatment between 1998 2008 by the prison staff and failure to carry out an effective investigation into these allegations violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31300
L. v. Lithuania
L. v. Lithuania LTU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private life on account of the absence of implementing legislation to regulate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4320
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine
LEVCHUK v. Ukraine UKR 03/12/2020 00:00:00 15/12/2020 14:13:50 Case Description: This group of cases 1 concerns principally the authorities failure to ensure that the applicants can enjoy their homes free from harassment and violent disturbance violations EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56503
M.M. v. the United Kingdom
M.M. v. the United Kingdom GBR 29/04/2013 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Unlawful interference with private life: indefinite retention and disclosure of data regarding a police caution for child abduction received by the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3007