Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 141 - 160 of 350
KHAYLO v. Ukraine
KHAYLO v. Ukraine UKR 13/02/2009 00:00:00 08/11/2016 13:48:08 Case Description: These cases concern procedural violations of Article 2 of the Convention on account of the lack of effective investigations into the deaths of the applicants relatives caused EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33459
KHUDOYOROV v. Russia
KHUDOYOROV v. Russia RUS 04/12/2006 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: The case of Khudoyorov concerns violation of the applicant s right to liberty on account of several unlawful periods of detention on remand Article 5 1 in Vladimir in 2001 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14086
KIM v. Russia
KIM v. Russia RUS 17/10/2014 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns different violations related to the detention of stateless or foreign national applicants between 2010 and 2020 pending administrative removal from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14160
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
KITANOVSKI v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 22/04/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:31:05 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants torture or other forms of ill treatment by police agents during their arrest questioning transfer to a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6582
KIYUTIN v. Russia
KIYUTIN v. Russia RUS 15/09/2011 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Discriminatory refusal of residence permits to foreign nationals on account of their HIV positive status the law permitting no individualised evaluation of their capacities EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14026
KLYAKHIN v. Russia
KLYAKHIN v. Russia RUS 06/06/2005 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: All the cases in this group concern violations of the applicants right to liberty and security in the context of detention on remand mostly arising from: Article 5 1: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14064
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria
KOLEVI v. Bulgaria BGR 05/02/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:17:44 Case Description: The group S.Z. which includes also the cases X. and Others Y. Y.P. and Z. concerns ineffective investigations into rape false imprisonment and incitement to prostitution and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3557
KOSTIC v. Serbia
KOSTIC v. Serbia SRB 25/02/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 14:45:07 Case Description: The majority of these cases concerns violations of the applicants rights to access to a court where: i the authorities since 1996 failed to enforce or enforced with significant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8635
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KOVAL AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 15/02/2013 00:00:00 16/03/2021 17:52:31 Case Description: These cases concern various irregularities in searches and seizure of property by law enforcement authorities violations of Article 8 and/or Article 1 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31608
KOZUL AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
KOZUL AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of excessive length of enforcement proceedings pending since 2002 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54115
KRASIMIR YORDANOV v. Bulgaria
KRASIMIR YORDANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 15/05/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of correspondence and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to return to the applicant items seized in the context of a criminal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3787
KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. Russia
KRUPKO AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 17/11/2014 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:34:26 Case Description: This group of cases Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights of the Jehovah s Witnesses. The case of Taganrog LRO concerns violation of various rights of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22940
KUDESHKINA v. Russia
KUDESHKINA v. Russia RUS 14/09/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the applicant s right to freedom of expression due to disciplinary proceedings leading to her dismissal in 2004 from judicial office for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13926
KULINSKI AND SABEV v. Bulgaria
KULINSKI AND SABEV v. Bulgaria BGR 21/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: These cases concern the impossibility for the applicants to vote in parliamentary elections or in elections to the European Parliament between 2009 and 2019 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39505
KUNIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
KUNIC AND OTHERS v. Bosnia and Herzegovina BIH 14/02/2018 00:00:00 06/03/2018 14:12:52 Case Description: This group of cases concerns violations of the applicants right to a fair trial on account of non enforcement of domestic judgments ordering four EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49047
KURZAC v. Poland
KURZAC v. Poland POL 22/05/2001 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Length of rehabilitation proceedings requesting the annulment of the applicant s brother s conviction in 1948 under the law of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17791
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
KUZNETSOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 11/04/2007 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: For the situation with the Jehovah s Witnesses in the Russian Federation see the separate notes in the cases Jehovah s Witnesses of Moscow and Others and Krupko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13635
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213
L.M. v. Latvia
L.M. v. Latvia LVA 19/10/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unlawful involuntary hospitalisation in a psychiatric institution without adequate safeguards in law and practice against arbitrary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12634
L. v. Lithuania
L. v. Lithuania LTU 31/03/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 16:57:59 Case Description: The case concerns the State s failure to fulfil its positive obligation to ensure respect for private life on account of the absence of implementing legislation to regulate the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4320