Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 42
A. v. Croatia
A. v. Croatia HRV 14/01/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection of private life: Failure of authorities to provide adequate protection against domestic violence due to various shortcomings e.g. individual programme during prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10339
ABELE v. Latvia
ABELE v. Latvia LVA 29/01/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 17:06:02 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: Living conditions in Brasa Prison for a deaf/mute person. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48873
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
BAKOS v. Hungary
BAKOS v. Hungary HUN 07/01/2016 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment and lack of a remedy: Poor conditions of pre trial and post conviction detention resulting mainly from a structural problem of overcrowding and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10737
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia
BRANKO TOMASIC AND OTHERS v. Croatia HRV 15/04/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Failure to protect the lives of the applicants relatives from a person who had been previously convicted of threatening to kill them Branko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10317
BURES v. the Czech Republic
BURES v. the Czech Republic CZE 18/01/2013 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:15:20 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Restraint and fastening of the applicant to a bed at Brno ernovice psychiatric hospital s sobering up centre and insufficiently EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
C.G. AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 24/07/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases C.G. and Others Kurilovich and Others M. and Others and Bou Hassoun concern shortcomings in the procedure for judicial review of decisions to expel foreign EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3769
CESTARO v. Italy
CESTARO v. Italy ITA 07/07/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: This group of four judgments and two decisions friendly settlements with undertakings concern the ill treatment suffered by the applicants at the hands of State agents and the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28298
CORALLO v. the Netherlands
CORALLO v. the Netherlands NLD 09/10/2018 00:00:00 18/10/2018 16:08:29 Case Description: This case concerns the poor conditions of the applicant s detention in the Philipsburg Police Station on Sint Maarten situated in the Caribbean where he was detained EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50579
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania ROU 19/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13455
GRZELAK v. Poland
GRZELAK v. Poland POL 22/11/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Discrimination based on religion: discriminatory treatment of an agnostic pupil due to the absence of a mark for religion/ethics in school certificates because of the failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-18399
GURBAN v. Turkey
GURBAN v. Turkey TUR 15/03/2016 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:35:29 Case Description: This group of cases concern violations of the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment on account of the applicants sentences to aggravated life EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36750
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary
ISTVAN GABOR KOVACS v. Hungary HUN 17/04/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: This group of cases concerns inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to the applicants poor conditions of detention both pre trial and post conviction resulting EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10809
JERONOVICS v. Latvia
JERONOVICS v. Latvia LVA 01/03/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: Unfair criminal proceedings due to impossibility for detained EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12630
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
KARABET AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 17/04/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern principally large scale violence against prisoners with the involvement of special forces rapid reaction units and prison staff either as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32113
KUCHERUK v. Ukraine
KUCHERUK v. Ukraine UKR 06/12/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns a number of substantial and procedural violations of the applicant s rights under Article 3 while detained on remand at the Kharkiv Regional Pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31583
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland
KUCHTA AND METEL v. Poland POL 02/12/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: This case concerns the excessive use of force by the Police during the applicants arrest in February 2015 and ineffective investigation in the circumstances of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59191
L.B. v. Belgium
L.B. v. Belgium BEL 02/01/2013 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: This group concerns applicants who were interned because they were suffering from mental illness and considered dangerous in accordance with the social defence law . The Court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1213