Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 66
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AL-SKEINI AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom
AL SKEINI AND OTHERS v. the United Kingdom GBR 07/07/2011 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of independent and effective investigation into the deaths the applicants relatives Iraqi nationals during operations conducted by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3013
ALMEIDA SANTOS v. Portugal
ALMEIDA SANTOS v. Portugal PRT 06/01/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of civil proceedings and infringement of principle of equality of arms due to lackingpossibility as enjoyed EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9701
APEH ULDOZOTTEINEK SZOVETSEGE, IVANYI, ROTH AND SZERDAHELYI v. Hungary
APEH ULDOZOTTEINEK SZOVETSEGE IVANYI ROTH AND SZERDAHELYI v. Hungary HUN 05/01/2001 00:00:00 03/11/2016 08:47:27 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair non contentious proceedings in regard to the applicant association s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11276
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BOUSARRA v. France
BOUSARRA v. France FRA 23/12/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:14:44 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to expulsion of a Moroccan national on grounds of public order. Article 8 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33069
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
CONKA v. Belgium
CONKA v. Belgium BEL 05/05/2002 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / expulsion / prohibition of collective expulsion of aliens: Arrest of Slovakian nationals and asylum seekers of Roma origin with a view to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1477
CYPRUS v. Turkey
CYPRUS v. Turkey TUR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: The case concerns 14 violations in relation to the situation in the northern part of Cyprus since the military intervention by Turkey in July and August 1974 concerning: Greek EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37128
DURDEVIC v. Croatia
DURDEVIC v. Croatia HRV 19/10/2011 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Failure of police and prosecuting authorities to conduct an effective and independent investigation into allegations of ill treatment of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10119
FRIDMAN v. Lithuania
FRIDMAN v. Lithuania LTU 24/04/2017 00:00:00 01/06/2017 17:17:39 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of a fair trial due to the improper notification of the oral hearing in a civil case concerning annulment of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46903
FRISANCHO PEREA v. Slovakia
FRISANCHO PEREA v. Slovakia SVK 21/10/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:46:05 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference in the context of an international child abduction due to refusal of the applicant s request to participate EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7735
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. Ukraine
FYODOROV AND FYODOROVA v. Ukraine UKR 07/10/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: The case concerns the ill treatment of both applicants husband and wife on account of the disproportionate use of force by the police on 7 March 2003 when EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31579
G.V.A. v. Spain
G.V.A. v. Spain ESP 17/03/2015 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:12:44 Case Description: Issues related to expulsion and protection of family life: Expulsion of an Argentinian citizen a mother of a minor child and prohibition of re entry for 10 years: The Government EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3555
GABRIC v. Croatia
GABRIC v. Croatia HRV 05/05/2009 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:22:41 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the confiscation for failing to declare foreign currency at the border of the sums concerned by customs EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12505
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan
GAFGAZ MAMMADOV v. Azerbaijan AZE 14/03/2016 00:00:00 26/10/2016 09:02:49 Case Description: This group concerns numerous breaches of the applicants freedom of assembly through the dispersal of unauthorised peaceful demonstrations not posing any threat to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1743
GEREKSAR v. Turkey
GEREKSAR v. Turkey TUR 01/05/2011 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Expropriation on account of the construction of an airport on the applicants properties and failure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37246
GUREPKA v. Ukraine (no. 2)
GUREPKA v. Ukraine no. 2 UKR 08/07/2010 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern violations of the right to a fair trial due to the domestic authorities failure between 2004 and 2019 to duly notify the applicants of court EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31602
HAKIMI v. Belgium
HAKIMI v. Belgium BEL 29/09/2010 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the refusal by the court of appeal to reopen in absentia proceedings although the default EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1562