Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 37
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark DNK 15/12/2020 00:00:00 09/02/2021 09:54:42 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman or degrading treatment in 2013 of a man suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was strapped to a restraint bed in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56537
ALIYEV v. Ukraine
ALIYEV v. Ukraine UKR 10/06/2021 00:00:00 11/06/2021 17:47:07 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Unjustified interference due to the revocation in 2010 of the applicant s residence permit and the issuance of an expulsion order with a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57741
ANDERSSON AND OTHERS v. Sweden
ANDERSSON AND OTHERS v. Sweden SWE 25/12/2014 00:00:00 26/10/2016 19:44:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Inability to obtain a full judicial review of the authorities decisions permitting the construction of a railway EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2190
BABYLONOVA v. Slovakia
BABYLONOVA v. Slovakia SVK 20/09/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Protection of private life and home: Disproportionate interference due to legal inability to obtain the cancellation of a former resident s registration in the applicant EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7999
BRAGI GUÐMUNDUR KRISTJÁNSSON v. Iceland
BRAGI GU MUNDUR KRISTJ NSSON v. Iceland ISL 30/11/2021 00:00:00 16/12/2021 17:16:40 Case Description: These cases concern the violations of Article 4 of Protocol 7 right not to be tried or punished twice ne bis in idem on the account of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59201
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy
CITRARO AND MOLINO v. Italy ITA 04/06/2020 00:00:00 04/06/2020 19:55:36 Case Description: The case of Sy concerns the detention between December 2018 and May 2020 of the applicant who had a psychiatric condition aggravated by drug addiction in an ordinary EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55275
DE CLERCK v. Belgium
DE CLERCK v. Belgium BEL 25/12/2007 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The case has been closed. You can access the final resolution via the case documents tab . Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual measures: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1193
GORGULU v. Germany
GORGULU v. Germany DEU 26/05/2004 00:00:00 15/11/2016 14:32:10 Case Description: Protection of family life: Refusal to give custody to the father of a child born out of wedlock and living with a foster family without considering the long term effects on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-38410
GRACE GATT v. Malta
GRACE GATT v. Malta MLT 08/01/2020 00:00:00 24/01/2020 11:03:23 Case Description: This case concerns the lack of independence and impartiality of the bodies which decided on the applicant s dismissal from police force in 2015 violation of Article 6 1 . EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54591
GROSARU v. Romania
GROSARU v. Romania ROU 02/06/2010 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Just satisfaction paid. The impugned law was repealed and replaced by Law no. 208/2015. In the current system there are two autonomous bodies competent in the electoral EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13081
HOTI v. Croatia
HOTI v. Croatia HRV 26/07/2018 00:00:00 19/10/2018 11:51:40 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Failure of domestic authorities to provide an effective and accessible procedure to have the stateless applicant s stay and status in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50582
HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. Poland
HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20584
I.E. v. the Republic of Moldova
I.E. v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 26/08/2020 00:00:00 09/09/2020 09:40:56 Case Description: The case concerns the authorities failure to discharge their positive obligation to protect the applicant from ill treatment while he was under their full EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55845
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France
J.M.B. AND OTHERS v. France FRA 30/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 15:42:45 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment suffered by 27 of the applicants due to prison overcrowding and poor conditions of their detention personal space of less EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55363
KHAN v. France
KHAN v. France FRA 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: This case concerns the degrading treatment of the applicant a 12 year old unaccompanied minor UM in transit to the United Kingdom resulting from the authorities failure to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52223
KORMACHEVA v. Russia
KORMACHEVA v. Russia RUS 14/06/2004 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: excessive length of civil and criminal proceedings and the lack of an effective domestic remedy in this respect as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13541
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia
KURIC AND OTHERS v. Slovenia SVN 26/06/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 16:00:06 Case Description: Protection of private and family life and discrimination: Automatic deprivation without prior notification of the applicants status as permanent residents in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12107
LABITA v. Italy
LABITA v. Italy ITA 06/04/2000 00:00:00 28/11/2016 10:48:54 Case Description: Detention protection against ill treatment / protection of rights in detention: Lack of effective investigations into allegations of ill treatment in prison despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-44905
LIU v. Russia (no. 2)
LIU v. Russia no. 2 RUS 03/08/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern the applicants exclusion on national security grounds from the Russian Federation in different time periods from 2004 to 2015 in violation of their right EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14148
MELNYCHENKO v. Ukraine
MELNYCHENKO v. Ukraine UKR 30/03/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Electoral rights: Arbitrary refusal by the Central Electoral Commission upheld by the Supreme Court of the applicant s registration as a parliamentary candidate on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31100