Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 191
A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom
A.D.T. v. the United Kingdom GBR 31/10/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private: Prohibition by law of homosexual acts between several consenting men in private and conviction of the applicant for gross indecency in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2540
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
AGACHE AND OTHERS v. Romania
AGACHE AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 20/01/2010 00:00:00 06/11/2016 16:19:47 Case Description: Ineffectiveness of investigations into the death of the applicants relative a police officer killed in the 1989 anti communist demonstrations: Length of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17506
ALAJOS KISS v. Hungary
ALAJOS KISS v. Hungary HUN 20/08/2010 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:32:51 Case Description: Electoral rights: Illegitimate restriction of voting rights due to their indiscriminate removal without individualised judicial evaluation solely on the grounds of mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10509
ALISIC AND OTHERS v. Serbia
ALISIC AND OTHERS v. Serbia SRB 16/07/2014 00:00:00 07/10/2016 11:12:28 Case Description: Protection of property: Unlawful interference due to inability of the applicant a national of Bosnia and Herzegovina to recover old foreign currency savings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ANATOLIY MARINOV v. Bulgaria
ANATOLIY MARINOV v. Bulgaria BGR 15/05/2022 00:00:00 02/06/2022 14:41:20 Case Description: These cases concern the impossibility for the applicants to vote in parliamentary elections or in elections to the European Parliament between 2009 and 2019 because EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60403
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ASSOCIATION '21 DECEMBRE 1989' AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION 21 DECEMBRE 1989 AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 28/11/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases mainly 1 concern the criminal investigations carried out since the early 1990s into violent crackdowns on anti governmental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13065
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
AYCAGUER v. France
AYCAGUER v. France FRA 22/09/2017 00:00:00 03/10/2017 09:13:29 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference with regard to the applicant s refusal in the context of a criminal sanction to comply with the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47815
B. v. Romania (no. 2)
B. v. Romania no. 2 ROU 19/05/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Lack of adequate legal protection of the applicant on the occasion of her psychiatric confinements as from 2000 and during proceedings which led to maintaining the measure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13089
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BANNIKOV v. Latvia
BANNIKOV v. Latvia LVA 11/09/2013 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:49 Case Description: Excessive length of pre trial detention: lack of sufficient grounds to justify the applicant s continued detention. Status of Execution: On 1 October 2005 the provisions of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31106
BELOZOROV v. Russia
BELOZOROV v. Russia RUS 15/01/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern different violations linked to the unlawful transfer of individuals from Ukraine to the Russian Federation. In both cases the European Court found a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55229
BELOZOROV v. Ukraine
BELOZOROV v. Ukraine UKR 15/01/2016 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These cases concern different violations linked to the unlawful transfer of individuals from Ukraine to the Russian Federation. In both cases the European Court found a EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14094
BERECZKI v. Romania
BERECZKI v. Romania ROU 26/07/2016 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Lack of impartiality of the county court which had examined and dismissed in 2007 the administrative action brought by the applicant against the judicial experts office on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13167
BIAO v. Denmark
BIAO v. Denmark DNK 24/05/2016 00:00:00 12/10/2016 18:12:08 Case Description: Discrimination: Refusal of the applicants request for spousal reunification without compelling or weighty reasons in comparison to the more favourable conditions for family EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland
BRONIOWSKI v. Poland POL 22/06/2004 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the absence of an effective mechanism to enforce the applicant s right to compensation reaffirmed in the Land EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17801