Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 52
AL NASHIRI v. Poland
AL NASHIRI v. Poland POL 16/02/2015 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases concern the violation of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicants were victims of a secret rendition operation involving their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20624
AL NASHIRI v. Romania
AL NASHIRI v. Romania ROU 08/10/2018 00:00:00 10/12/2018 09:38:46 Case Description: The case concerns violations of a number of Convention rights arising from the fact that the applicant was the victim of an extraordinary rendition operation. The European EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50873
ANTIA AND KHUPENIA v. Georgia
ANTIA AND KHUPENIA v. Georgia GEO 18/09/2020 00:00:00 29/09/2020 17:20:46 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of Article 7 due to the applicants 2006 conviction for neglect of official duties as inspectors of the Unified State Social Insurance EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55939
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS & EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria
ASSOCIATION FOR EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND HUMAN RIGHTS EKIMDZHIEV v. Bulgaria BGR 30/01/2008 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3669
AYETULLAH AY v. Turkey
AYETULLAH AY v. Turkey TUR 08/03/2021 00:00:00 06/04/2021 20:53:01 Case Description: The case concerns unfair criminal proceedings relating to terrorism. The shortcomings found include inter alia: Lack of assistance and presence of a lawyer at the time of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57071
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BEGHAL v. the United Kingdom
BEGHAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: Protection of private life: Arbitrary interference due to the use of counter terrorism legislation by border control officers Schedule 7 Powers to stop and question EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52217
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BRUNET v. France
BRUNET v. France FRA 18/12/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:16:33 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference due to the lack of a real possibility for seeking deletion of information recorded in a crime database despite the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-30069
CABALLERO v. the United Kingdom
CABALLERO v. the United Kingdom GBR 08/02/2000 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: The ECHR accepted the government s concession of a violation on the ground of the automatic denial of bail following charges EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2512
CATT v. the United Kingdom
CATT v. the United Kingdom GBR 24/04/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: The case concerns the retention from 2005 till present of personal data of a lifelong peace activist born in 1925 on a police database. The data included information EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52207
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom
COPLAND v. the United Kingdom GBR 03/07/2007 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of private life and correspondence: Arbitrary interference due to monitoring of the applicant s telephone e mail and internet usage during the course of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2682
DE LESQUEN DU PLESSIS-CASSO v. France
DE LESQUEN DU PLESSIS CASSO v. France FRA 12/07/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:16:17 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s criminal conviction for public defamation of a deputy mayor during a municipal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-33303
DORNEANU v. Romania
DORNEANU v. Romania ROU 28/02/2018 00:00:00 16/03/2018 17:33:32 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman treatment suffered by the applicant an inmate afflicted with terminal prostate cancer. The European Court ruled that his continued detention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49135
E.B. AND OTHERS v. Austria
E.B. AND OTHERS v. Austria AUT 07/02/2014 00:00:00 25/10/2016 11:58:40 Case Description: Discrimination and lack of effective remedy: Dismissal of requests to delete convictions under former Article 209 of the Criminal Code sexual relations of a male EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1107
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
EKIMDZHIEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 11/04/2022 00:00:00 28/04/2022 15:31:34 Case Description: These cases concern the lack of sufficient safeguards against the risk of abuse which is inherent in every secret surveillance system and the absence of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60163
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine
FEDORCHENKO AND LOZENKO v. Ukraine UKR 20/12/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: This group of cases mainly concerns the lack of effective investigations into violent acts against the applicants including into the possible motives of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31354
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom
GAUGHRAN v. the United Kingdom GBR 13/06/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: These cases concern disproportionate and unjustified interferences with the applicants right to respect for their private lives due to the indefinite retention of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55601
GUKOVYCH v. Ukraine
GUKOVYCH v. Ukraine UKR 20/01/2017 00:00:00 22/03/2017 14:48:44 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention: Unnecessary detention in a sobering up centre without clear accessible and foreseeable legal basis. Article 5 1e Status of Execution: Case EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46261