Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 37
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway NOR 31/08/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of certain civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-193
A. v. Norway
A. v. Norway NOR 09/07/2009 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of private life: Domestic courts failure to protect the applicant s reputation due to the unfavourable outcome of a defamation suit that he brought against a newspaper EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-205
ANDREASSEN, ARNT v. Norway
ANDREASSEN ARNT v. Norway NOR 25/06/1994 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 The text for this case is undergoing review and will be published at a later date EXEC 61427 text, undergoing, review, published https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-169 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-169
BECKER v. Norway
BECKER v. Norway NOR 05/01/2018 00:00:00 15/01/2018 16:40:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Insufficient reasons given by domestic court to compel a journalist to give evidence in criminal proceedings against her source who had already come EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48683
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BOTTEN v. Norway
BOTTEN v. Norway NOR 19/02/1996 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 The text for this case is undergoing review and will be published at a later date EXEC 61046 text, undergoing, review, published https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-167 BOTTEN v. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-167
BUTT v. Norway
BUTT v. Norway NOR 04/03/2013 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Interference with family and private life in case of deportation to Pakistan Status of Execution: Immigration Appeals Board granted permanent residence in 2012. One of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-213
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania ROU 19/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13455
EINAR AND AMELIA RIIS v. Norway
EINAR AND AMELIA RIIS v. Norway NOR 17/04/2008 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-201
EKEBERG v. Norway
EKEBERG v. Norway NOR 31/10/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to lacking impartiality of the High Court on the ground of the participation of a judge previously EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-195
FOLGERO AND OTHERS v. Norway
FOLGERO AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 29/06/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Right to education: Refusal to grant full exemption from instruction in Christianity religion and philosophy in State primary schools right Article 2 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-187
HAMMERN v. Norway
HAMMERN v. Norway NOR 11/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence in that suspicions were expressed in a court decision dealing with compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-181
HANSEN v. Norway
HANSEN v. Norway NOR 02/01/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure of the High Court as an appellate court entrusted with full jurisdiction to give sufficient reasons for its refusal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-211
HOHOLM v. Slovakia
HOHOLM v. Slovakia SVK 01/06/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and effective remedy: Failure to provide speedy proceedings for the return of the applicant s children under the Hague EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8373
HOKKELING v. the Netherlands
HOKKELING v. the Netherlands NLD 03/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on account of the Court of Appeal s refusal to consider measures that would have enabled the applicant who was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47531
JOHANSEN v. Norway
JOHANSEN v. Norway NOR 07/08/1996 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 The text for this case is undergoing review and will be published at a later date EXEC 61053 text, undergoing, review, published https://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-171 JOHANSEN v. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-171
KAPLAN AND OTHERS v. Norway
KAPLAN AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 24/10/2014 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Expulsion of a family father to Turkey with a five year re entry ban. Status of Execution: Just satisfaction paid. The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-221
KASTE v. Norway
KASTE v. Norway NOR 09/02/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings as the applicants could not directly question one of the co accused whose depositions made to the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-197
KRISTIANSEN v. Norway
KRISTIANSEN v. Norway NOR 18/03/2016 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings due to justifiable grounds on which to doubt the High Court s impartiality on account of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-219