Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Displaying 1 - 20 of 47
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway
A. AND E. RIIS v. Norway NOR 31/08/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of certain civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-193
A.L. AND OTHERS v. Norway
A.L. AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 20/04/2022 00:00:00 06/05/2022 12:33:12 Case Description: Repetitive case. Relevant leading cases with detailed information on status of execution including examinations by the Committee of Ministers are presented in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60257
A.S. v. Norway
A.S. v. Norway NOR 17/03/2020 00:00:00 06/04/2020 10:36:23 Case Description: Repetitive case. Relevant leading cases with detailed information on status of execution including examinations by the Committee of Ministers are presented in the leading cases EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55085
A. v. Norway
A. v. Norway NOR 09/07/2009 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Protection of private life: Domestic courts failure to protect the applicant s reputation due to the unfavourable outcome of a defamation suit that he brought against a newspaper EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-205
BECKER v. Norway
BECKER v. Norway NOR 05/01/2018 00:00:00 15/01/2018 16:40:37 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Insufficient reasons given by domestic court to compel a journalist to give evidence in criminal proceedings against her source who had already come EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48683
BERGENS TIDENDE & OTHERS v. Norway
BERGENS TIDENDE OTHERS v. Norway NOR 02/08/2000 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper and its two editors being convicted in civil defamation proceedings EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-177
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway
BLADET TROMSO AND STENSAAS v. Norway NOR 20/05/1999 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Disproportionate interference on account of the applicant newspaper company and its editor being convicted in civil defamation EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-173
BUTT v. Norway
BUTT v. Norway NOR 04/03/2013 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Interference with family and private life in case of deportation to Pakistan Status of Execution: Immigration Appeals Board granted permanent residence in 2012. One of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-213
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania
CENTRE FOR LEGAL RESOURCES ON BEHALF OF VALENTIN CAMPEANU v. Romania ROU 17/07/2014 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern deficiencies in the legal protection system for adults with intellectual disabilities or with mental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13375
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania
CRISTIAN TEODORESCU v. Romania ROU 19/09/2012 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases concern longstanding structural deficiencies linked to overcrowding and inadequate living conditions treatment and care afforded to patients and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13455
EINAR AND AMELIA RIIS v. Norway
EINAR AND AMELIA RIIS v. Norway NOR 17/04/2008 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-201
EKEBERG v. Norway
EKEBERG v. Norway NOR 31/10/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair proceedings due to lacking impartiality of the High Court on the ground of the participation of a judge previously EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-195
F.Z. v. Norway
F.Z. v. Norway NOR 01/07/2021 00:00:00 02/07/2021 16:22:27 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to shortcomings in the public child welfare authorities and courts decision making processes concerning EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58033
FOLGERO AND OTHERS v. Norway
FOLGERO AND OTHERS v. Norway NOR 29/06/2007 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Right to education: Refusal to grant full exemption from instruction in Christianity religion and philosophy in State primary schools right Article 2 of Protocol EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-187
HAMMERN v. Norway
HAMMERN v. Norway NOR 11/05/2003 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the presumption of innocence in that suspicions were expressed in a court decision dealing with compensation for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-181
HANSEN v. Norway
HANSEN v. Norway NOR 02/01/2015 00:00:00 20/10/2016 18:39:43 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure of the High Court as an appellate court entrusted with full jurisdiction to give sufficient reasons for its refusal EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-211
HERNEHULT v. Norway
HERNEHULT v. Norway NOR 07/09/2020 00:00:00 23/09/2020 10:56:42 Case Description: Repetitive case. Relevant leading cases with detailed information on status of execution including examinations by the Committee of Ministers are presented in the leading EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55911
HOHOLM v. Slovakia
HOHOLM v. Slovakia SVK 01/06/2015 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and effective remedy: Failure to provide speedy proceedings for the return of the applicant s children under the Hague EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-8373
HOKKELING v. the Netherlands
HOKKELING v. the Netherlands NLD 03/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on account of the Court of Appeal s refusal to consider measures that would have enabled the applicant who was EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47531
JANSEN v. Norway
JANSEN v. Norway NOR 06/12/2018 00:00:00 17/12/2018 15:41:48 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: Disproportionate interference due to the authorities decision to deprive the applicant of contact with her child who was in foster care EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51027