Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 9 of 9
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines
Alonzo et al. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020 Communication number s : 155/2020 Author: Natalia M. Alonzo Perla B. Balingit Virginia M. Bangit Francia A. Buco Dela Paz B. Culala Belen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country JUTBCEDAW/C/84/D/155/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3765/en-US
Faurisson v. France
Faurisson v. France CCPR/C/58/D/550/1993 Communication number s : 550/1993 Author: Robert Faurisson Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country France Submission date 02 Jan 1993 Date of decision 08 Nov 1996 Comment: Pursuant to rule 85 of JUTBCCPR/C/58/D/550/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/654/en-US
Fedotova v. Russian Federation
Fedotova v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/106/D/1932/2010 Communication number s : 1932/2010 Author: Irina Fedotova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 106 Country Russian Federation Submission date 10 Feb 2010 Date of decision 31 Oct 2012 JUTBCCPR/C/106/D/1932/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1272/en-US
Ltaief v. Tunisia
Ltaief v. Tunisia CAT/C/31/D/189/2001 Communication number s : 189/2001 Author: Bouabdallah Ltaief Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Tunisia Submission date 30 Jun 2000 Date of decision 14 Nov 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/31/D/189/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/163/en-US
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
O.N., D.P. v. Russian Federation
O.N. D.P. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/75/D/119/2017 Communication number s : 119/2017 Author: O.N. D.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Russian Federation Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/119/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2709/en-US
S.T. v. Russian Federation
S.T. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014 Communication number s : 065/2014 Author: S.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 08 Nov 2013 Date of decision 25 Jan 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/65/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2651/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
V.K. v. Bulgaria
V.K. v. Bulgaria CEDAW/C/49/D/20/2008 Communication number s : 020/2008 Author: Ms. V.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Bulgaria Submission date 15 Oct 2008 Date of decision 25 Jul 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/49/D/20/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1702/en-US