Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6
C.L.D. v. France
C.L.D. v. France CCPR/C/33/D/228/1987 Communication number s : 228/1987 Author: C.L.D. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 33 Country France Submission date 16 May 1987 Date of decision 18 Jul 1988 Comment: Two individual JUTBCCPR/C/33/D/228/1987https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/639/en-US
El Ayoubi et al v. Spain
El Ayoubi et al v. Spain E/C.12/69/D/54/2018 Communication number s : 054/2018 Author: El Ayoubi and El Azouan Azouz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Virtual Session Country Spain Submission date 17 Sep 2018 Date of decision 19 Feb 2021 JUTBE/C.12/69/D/54/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2924/en-US
López Albán et al. v. Spain
L pez Alb n et al. v. Spain E/C.12/66/D/37/2018 Communication number s : 037/2018 Author: Maribel Viviana L pez Alb n Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Spain Submission date 20 Jun 2018 Date of decision 11 Oct 2019 Comment: This JUTBE/C.12/66/D/37/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2606/en-US
Rsiwi v. Algeria
Rsiwi v. Algeria CCPR/C/130/D/2843/2016 Communication number s : 2843/2016 Author: Fatima Rsiwi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Sep 2016 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2843/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3293/en-US
S.F.M. v. Spain
S.F.M. v. Spain CEDAW/C/75/D/138/2018 Communication number s : 138/2018 Author: S.F.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Spain Submission date Date of decision 28 Feb 2020 Comment: Obstetric violence Substantive issues: gender JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/138/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2710/en-US
Sankhé v. Spain
Sankh v. Spain CEDAW/C/56/D/29/2011 Communication number s : 029/2011 Author: Ma mouna Sankh Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Spain Submission date 30 Dec 2010 Date of decision 11 Oct 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/56/D/29/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1698/en-US