Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 2685
AERTS v. Belgium
AERTS v. Belgium BEL 30/07/1998 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention / access to and effective functioning of justice: Lawfulness of the applicant s detention in a psychiatric wing of a prison pending his EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1369
ALKOVIC v. Montenegro
ALKOVIC v. Montenegro MNE 05/03/2018 00:00:00 20/03/2018 16:34:47 Case Description: Discrimination and protection of private life family and home: Failure to protect the applicant a Roma and a Muslim from a series of apparently ethnically and/or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49175
Aden et al. v. Denmark
Aden et al. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015 Communication number s : 2531/2015 Author: Nimo Mohamed Aden and Liban Muhammed Hassan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Sep 2014 Date of decision 25 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2531/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2791/en-US
B.V. v. Belgium
B.V. v. Belgium BEL 02/08/2017 00:00:00 11/09/2017 09:42:58 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of serious and thorough investigations carried after the applicant had lodged a criminal complaint alleging rape and indecent assault. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47595
B. v. Belgium
B. v. Belgium BEL 19/11/2012 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: Protection of family life: Unnecessary interference due to an appeal court s decision on a forced return to an allegedly abusive father of a child well integrated in the host EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1253
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
BEUZE v. Belgium
BEUZE v. Belgium BEL 09/11/2018 00:00:00 16/11/2018 14:46:27 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of criminal proceedings as a whole due to the fact that procedural defects which had occurred at pre trial stage EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50769
BORGERS v. Belgium
BORGERS v. Belgium BEL 30/10/1991 00:00:00 25/10/2016 14:46:28 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings on the ground of the infringement of the principle of the equality of arms due to the applicant s EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1297
C.M. v. Belgium
C.M. v. Belgium BEL 13/06/2018 00:00:00 29/06/2018 15:03:37 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to enforce judicial decisions ordering the applicant s neighbour to carry out rehabilitation work in order to comply with EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49765
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND 58802/12 MOTZ S. HASSAN T. CHE 1/7/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion 350 620 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD005880212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139903
CASE OF A. AND B. v. MONTENEGRO
CASE OF A. AND B. v. MONTENEGRO 37571/05 RADULOVIC P. MNE 3/5/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Peaceful enjoyment of possessions Possessions ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0305JUD003757105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116972
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.B. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE [Extracts]
CASE OF A.B. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE Extracts 11593/12 TERCERO F. FRA 7/12/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0712JUD001159312https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-165262
CASE OF A.B. v. HUNGARY
CASE OF A.B. v. HUNGARY 33292/09 KADAR A. HUN 4/16/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 3 Length of pre trial detention Reasonableness of pre trial detention Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0416JUD003329209https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-118578
CASE OF A.B. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.B. v. RUSSIA 1439/06 BELINSKAYA M. RUS 10/14/2010 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violations of Art. 3 substantive aspect Violation of Art. 5 1 Non pecuniary damage award Article 109 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 350 90 193 448 220 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1014JUD000143906https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100964
CASE OF A.B. v. SLOVAKIA
CASE OF A.B. v. SLOVAKIA 41784/98 SVK 3/4/2003 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 with regard to refusal to appoint a lawyer No violation of Art. 6 1 with regard to alleged arbitrariness of decision Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0304JUD004178498https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60965
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.B. v. THE NETHERLANDS 37328/97 N/A NLD 1/29/2002 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 in respect of control of correspondence with the Commission and with lawyer No violation of Art. 8 in respect of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0129JUD003732897https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60019
CASE OF A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.D. AND O.D. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 28680/06 MOLE N. GBR 3/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 13 8 No violation of Art. 13 Non pecuniary damage award Section 23 6 of the Children Act 1989 238 354 444 110 451 268 376 425 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0316JUD002868006https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97636